The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010.
The bar graph compares the proportion of British people contributing to charity categorized by age bracket in 1990 and 2010.
Overall, it is evident that more young and middle aged adults made charitable donations in the first year of a period, whereas eventually, the trend changed for British citizens.
In terms of details,in 1990, the presenters of age-group 36-50 subsidised money to charity at around 42%, which was the highest figure for both years. 35% of this age range made contributions in 2010. The 18-25s gave money to charity foundations the least of all age groups, making up just over 15 per cent initially and the lowest about 7 per cent in 2010.
According to the figures of people aged 26 and 35, in 1990, they accounted for 30%, but in the next 20 years it fell to just under a quarter in Great Britain. However, the age brackets 51-65 and over 65 rose the donations from 35% to nearly 40% and from approximately a third to about 36 per cent, respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-21 | CharanpreetSingh | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-20 | exdiscipulus | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-21 | manaswi.ielts | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-11 | azizkhon | 61 | view |
| 2019-10-28 | Zuna-ira | 67 | view |
- The chart below shows estimated world literacy rates by region and by gender for the year 2000. 84
- The table below shows the results of surveys in 2000, 2005 and 2010 about one university. 78
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010. 78
- Some people argue that it is more important to have an enjoyable job than to earn a lot of money. Others disagree and think that a good salary leads to a better life. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 84
- Every year several languages die out. Some people think that this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 20, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , in
...r British citizens. In terms of details,in 1990, the presenters of age-group 36-50...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, third, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 808.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6976744186 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65501046779 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633720930233 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 231.3 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2443938541 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.428571429 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5714285714 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284802855243 0.215688989381 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135677036542 0.103423049105 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0623819009445 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173449531584 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0577942915619 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.