should a city preserve or destroy its historic buildings
Historical buildings are an important part of the history of any country. They display cultural and architectural of the identity of every nation. Definitely, some people if asked would agree with the statement that the historical building should be preserved while others have a negative attitude toward this idea. As I am concerned, I absolutely agree that the historical building should be protected against any danger that may be influenced their well-being. In the following paragraphs, I will shed light on the arguments to supporting my view.
The first and the most reason is that the historical buildings are the treasure structures that we cannot assess their value by money. If they are destroyed, there won’t be a replacement for them anymore, even if an architecture builds a building completely like before, this a new construction is a fake building and have not historical valuable. For example, due to the serious earthquake about five years ago, one of my hometown historical building entirely destroyed, although, the government tries to build a building exactly like former this new structure has not the historical value. Because the worth of historical building depends on its age.
The second reason is that with this historical building we can get a lot of information about the ancestor’s lifestyle and religion, culture and so on. Sometimes this building tells us a story of people who dedicated their lives to protect our country. Many of the ancient inscriptions that engraved on the wall of this building state about the soldiers that battled for protection of the independence of our country that made us appreciate of our ancestors for all of their braves in the past.
Finally, the historical building can attract many tourists to our country that it could be a major revenue for the government to use this money for improving people’s life. Tourists often choose the city for visiting base on where this city has the historical places or not. For instance in my country, historical cities attracted more tourist. Shiraz is a center of attention of tourists because of many historical places that exist in this city. Every year historical heritage announced that Shiraz is the first destination of tourists.
By way of conclusion, base on the arguments explored above, I am of the opinion that we must preserve the old building because of their historical value that we cannot replace them if they are destroyed. And also this structure gives us a lot of info about the past.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? To improve the quality of education, universities should spend money on salaries university professors. 66
- Do you agree or disagree the following statement The more money a person has the more should he or she give away to charities 80
- Should we save our land for endangered animals 71
- TPO16Q1 80
- Are government doing well in educating people to pay attention to the importance of the food nutrition and healthy eating? 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 597, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...structure has not the historical value. Because the worth of historical building depend...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 267, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... gives us a lot of info about the past.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, if, may, second, so, well, while, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2114.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 415.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09397590361 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51348521516 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89118873037 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501204819277 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 670.5 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.0265869073 48.9658058833 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.263157895 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8421052632 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.26315789474 5.45110844103 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333777349706 0.236089414692 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111134728555 0.076458572812 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0743070876421 0.0737576698707 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179775889991 0.150856017488 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0708163357606 0.0645574589148 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.