The charts below show the proportion of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.
The pie charts illustrate the percentage of students who were able to speak other languages besides English in a university in England over a period of 10 years between 2000 and 2010.
Overall, the number of students spoke Spanish only increased significantly over the period surveyed; whereas the figure for university students who did not speak any languages in addition to English saw a sharp decline.
The percentage of monolingual students decreased by half in 2010; however, the figure for students speaking three languages including English rose from 10% to 15%.
Meanwhile, the figure for students speaking German remained unchanged, at only 10% during the period shown.; whereas that of students who spoke French saw a 5% decrease. The proportion of university students used Spanish and other language as the second language increased significantly. The former contributed to 35% and the latter accounted for one-fifth of the total in 2010.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-02 | maerd z | 73 | view |
| 2019-02-01 | huathibichngoc.c3.ltt@gmail.com | 84 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014. 73
- The tables below give information about the sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries. 73
- Many parents complain that computer games have no value to their children’s studies. On the contrary, those online games have produced a lot of negative effects on their mental development. What is your opinion? 61
- The chart below shows how frequency people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 56
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.Discuss both views and giv 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, however, if, second, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 809.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 150.0 196.424390244 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39333333333 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49963551158 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84285459041 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 83.0 106.607317073 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553333333333 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.404467794 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.833333333 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3333333333 5.23603664747 197% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.42789813974 0.215688989381 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.21479942845 0.103423049105 208% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118337390294 0.0843802449381 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.27456317218 0.15604864568 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107312309541 0.0819641961636 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.