Team sports are generally promoted as a great way to keep fit and build character. However, sporting events such as soccer matches are often accompanied by violence between rival supporters and other forms of antisocial behaviour. If sporting events cause antisocial behaviour, can team sports really be good for us?
Recently, the phenomenon of sporting events and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the significance of complex procedures is highly benficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly constructive and concequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that antisocial behavior can be a plus and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, promoting teams can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that social behavior, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Hence, beneficial ramifications of both doing physical exercise and following sport events apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, violence between rival supporters might increase the consquences of critical needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is corrlated negatively with vital issues. Thus, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of keeping fit and building charcter far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues' potential implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-26 | Ammu helen | 55 | view |
| 2019-08-18 | girlxxx | 77 | view |
| 2019-08-04 | shyamsingh08 | 77 | view |
| 2019-07-31 | Sgms | 77 | view |
| 2019-07-26 | edsonsimoes | 55 | view |
- In today's world different government and international organizations are confronting many problems. What is the most pressing problem among them? 88
- In education system, assessment through formal written examination is still valid? Agree or Disagree? 88
- Lifestyle affects health, how should health/ medical department responds? 88
- The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in the future. Do you agree or disagree? 11
- Parents are responsible for the behavior of the children. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1360.0 1207.87684729 113% => OK
No of words: 237.0 242.827586207 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.73839662447 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20106090765 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 139.433497537 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.713080168776 0.580463131201 123% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 379.143842365 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9164416506 50.4703680194 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.636363636 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5454545455 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.09090909091 7.25397266985 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156607007133 0.242375264174 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0487221326189 0.0925447433944 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0517368340354 0.071462118173 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0765819295816 0.151781067708 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0261046828685 0.0609392437508 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 12.6369458128 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.01 11.5310837438 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.41 8.32886699507 137% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 55.0591133005 183% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.