Do you think formal written assessments in today's world to assess students’ performance is effective or not? Discuss your viewpoint on this and support your answer with examples.
Recently, the phenomenon of formal written assessments in today's world and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that assessing students’ performance can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, writing assessment can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both education approach and examin processes apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, evaluating written assessment might increase the consequences of evaluation approch. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of oral asignment far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of developing education skills, but also pinpoint thorny issues’ potential implications.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-11-26 | sidved123@gmail.com | 77 | view |
2019-05-21 | andrefreitas | 61 | view |
2019-04-26 | AkashPTEnikalo | 77 | view |
2019-03-22 | Rajnikant Chauhan | 77 | view |
2019-02-14 | arami | 88 | view |
- The law can change human behavior. Do you agree or not? 88
- more information is available online and library books has no place.agree or disagree? 11
- Age discrimination occurs when a decision is made on the basis of a person’s age. In the workplace, these are most often decisions about being employed in the first place, winning promotions or being unfairly dismissed. Should discrimination against old 11
- Climate change is a major concern for governments all around the world. If you want to study a particular area of climate change, which subjects will you choose? 11
- In the education system, assessment through written formal examination is valid or not? 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1407.0 1207.87684729 116% => OK
No of words: 238.0 242.827586207 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.91176470588 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31741514945 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.705882352941 0.580463131201 122% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.883684532 50.4703680194 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.909090909 104.977214359 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6363636364 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.36363636364 7.25397266985 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202647436707 0.242375264174 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0658521752626 0.0925447433944 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0633000587235 0.071462118173 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106267337454 0.151781067708 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0554724396429 0.0609392437508 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 12.6369458128 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 53.1260098522 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.0 11.5310837438 147% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.51 8.32886699507 138% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 55.0591133005 187% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.