The unlimited use of cars may cause many problems. What are those problems? In order to reduce the problems, should we discourage people to use cars?
Cars have been considered the primary means of transport of citizens nowadays. They bring the flexibility and convenience to human lives. However, there are numerous problems coming along with the use of cars which need to be tackled instantaneously.
The increasing number of cars used daily has brought various issues. Firstly, there are more and more traffic jams happened around the world. In the early mornings or late evenings, people have to spend hours stuck in the traffic congestion when they commute to and from work or school, which affects detrimentally to their work efficiency. Secondly, the fact of using a lot of cars also cause severe consequences for the environment. For example, in big cities like Bangkok and Hanoi, cars emit a lot of gas which results in air pollution. Consequently, people have to wear face masks whenever they go out. Moreover, the amount of mercury in Bangkok’s air is at the alarming rate which makes lots of schools close temporarily. As a result, cars have brought several problems to our lives and the environment as well.
However, enacting legislation to force people to stop using cars is not a thorough solution since there are still other effective ways. The first efficient method is to encourage citizens to use public transport instead of private vehicles. Governments should renovate the system in order to supply enough buses or underground trains to meet the travel needs of their people. In fact, offering a discount for students and working people is also a highly possible action to increase the use of public transport. Another considerable way is that authorities should support manufacturers to produce more environmentally friendly cars. For example, in Western nations, people commute by electric cars which is not harmful to the environment.
From the above-mentioned, the mass number of cars using has caused several detrimental effects to human’s lives and the surrounding aspects as well. Authorities should take action which is mentioned above to solve the issues immediately in order to bring back the clean environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-15 | sudhir parmar | 56 | view |
| 2019-06-09 | LyGiaHuy | 89 | view |
| 2019-02-04 | huathibichngoc.c3.ltt@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2019-01-15 | maatxym | 84 | view |
| 2018-08-29 | venusrio | 84 | view |
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.Why is this the case?What can be done about this problem? 73
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals and that this money could be better spent on the human population. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 78
- The charts illustrate the number of people who were affected by fore types of noise pollution in day and night in cities and rural areas in 2007. 67
- Topic: Some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given in the protection of wild animals and birds. Do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 78
- The plan below show the layout of a university's sports centre now, and how it will look after redevelopment. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 335, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'meeting'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'train' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: meeting
...pply enough buses or underground trains to meet the travel needs of their people. In fa...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, however, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, well, for example, in fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1777.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27299703264 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94658006639 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572700296736 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.9370445338 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.5263157895 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7368421053 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47368421053 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252959862755 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0782137400122 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0582424302963 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159843798081 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0197237945837 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.