Educational institutions should dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
The future of students depends upon the knowledge he/she has gained in his life and education institution is a crucial part of people's lives to gain knowledge by studying different fields. In educational institutions, there are many fields of studies in which one has to understand it. But there are many fields which are of less or negligible importance in futuristic life. Yet, we have to study those fields because maybe it not only help to understand the topic of its content but also decide the future of one yet its chance is very less to get succeed. Thus I disagree with the above statement.
Educational institutions taught students necessary part which helps the student to understand its surrounding and helps to live in the environment. Like, social studies student learn in school is of less important to many of the students who are going to become engineers or doctors but it is useful to students who are going to take commerce or arts. At school, we are unable to decide our future hence if one has interest in science may be social studies is of no use to him/her but maybe it helps to the art student.
Although, many students are pre-decided about their goals for such students above statement stands true. Like Albert Einstein, one of the greatest scientists, have a good interest in mathematics hence, concentrate only on mathematics and fail in other subjects. But yet he gets succeeded in his life.
Even nowadays many fields have interdisciplinary which can be understood by the student if one has enough knowledge about the field. Thus we can not dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed. Maybe that field leads to the student to their success.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | jenniferjack07 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-28 | Kiho Park | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-27 | lanhhoang | 83 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | lanhhoang | 16 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | AkkineniAnuhya4 | 50 | view |
- According to recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in the older year. And yet the percentage of positive reviews by more reviewers about specific Super Screen movies actu 23
- Over the past two years, the number of shoppers in Central Plaza has been steadily decreasing while the popularity of skateboarding has increased dramatically. Many Central Plaza store owners believe that the decrease in their business is due to the numbe 50
- Educational institutions should dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 559, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...its chance is very less to get succeed. Thus I disagree with the above statement. ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 162, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'studies'' or 'study's'?
Suggestion: studies'; study's
...o live in the environment. Like, social studies student learn in school is of less impo...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 134, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...e has enough knowledge about the field. Thus we can not dissuade students from pursu...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, may, so, thus, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1433.0 2235.4752809 64% => OK
No of words: 294.0 442.535393258 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87414965986 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73186852729 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 215.323595506 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517006802721 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 704.065955056 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.8334406317 60.3974514979 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.357142857 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.21951772744 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.377399058107 0.243740707755 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140561252259 0.0831039109588 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.148794356286 0.0758088955206 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232372029044 0.150359130593 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.140275962744 0.0667264976115 210% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 14.1392134831 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 100.480337079 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.