Teachers' salaries should be based on the academic performance of their students.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
The statement asserts that the salary of educators should be based the degree of the performance of their students. I completely disagree with the statement’s assertion: students’ performance depends upon number of factors and there are some ramifications to approve salary for teachers relying upon the students’ performance over the year.
Initially, the primary reason why I disagree with the claim is that when teachers are sanctioned the salary depending upon the students’ performance teachers are more likely to be biased. For instance, let us take an example of the typical school scenario of sub urban schools. It is likely that most of the people are deprive of the facilities as well as impeded by the economic growth in the society. Being an individual member of that teacher have to fulfil their basic needs to survive. Hence, when the teacher’s salaries are based on how their students perform in the final examination, they are likely to be biased and give good grades to their students. This will result in the teacher’s acclamation among the society and in addition, will result in increase in salary. On the flip side, student’s actual test of knowledge will be left of alone, which may hinder in the overall development of the students as a responsible citizen of the nation.
Furthermore, the overall performance of the students largely depends upon their determination and effort on the personal basis, provided that teacher gives his/her complete effort as a responsible educator. Despite the fact that teacher is devoting full effort and time, the students may not put on equal effort commensurate to that of teachers. Moreover, some other factors—such as poverty, family problems, and health problems—may affect the overall performance over that period of time; it will ultimately hamper the teacher’s income for all his hard work and dedication.
Hence, in order to reconcile this discrepancy, teacher’s salary should be based on how teachers perform in the classroom. It can be carried out through his/her aptitude test, questionnaires among the students about the efficacy of his teaching methods and constant examination of the teacher’s effort and determination. During recruitment of the teacher for the particular subject, expert committee of the school administration should be formed and the teacher’s aptitude test can be examined through various workshops. In addition, review of the responses from the students of his/her teaching methodology, moral behaviour, and effectiveness of their teaching may signal the overall performance of the teacher. If the teacher fails to prove his/her position as an educator, it will be eligible to remunerate him/her on the performance basis. In contrary, however, the dedication and effort along with overall performance of the teacher is very impressive, it will be biased to provide salary for him on the basis of teacher’s performance.
In the conclusion, it will not be justifiable to form a student performance as basis to provide salary to the teacher: it is likely to make the teacher’s bias resulted due to the inclination to get higher salary. Also, there are many other factors will largely determine the students’ performance. Other methodologies can be implemented to gauge the overall performance of the teacher and thus salary can be appropriated based on the performance.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-29 | adamvg | 75 | view |
| 2019-09-12 | krishnaprasad7 | 50 | view |
| 2019-09-02 | Pushkar A Pandit | 50 | view |
| 2019-09-01 | alia123456 | 62 | view |
| 2019-03-07 | evanlu | 66 | view |
- In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement 83
- Two years ago, radio station WCQP in Rockville decided to increase the number of call-in advice programs that it broadcast; since that time, its share of the radio audience in the Rockville listening area has increased significantly. Given WCQP's rec 59
- Some people believe that in order to be effective, political leaders must yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise. Others believe that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently 81
- Fifteen years ago, Omega University implemented a new procedure that encouraged students to evaluate the teaching effectiveness of all their professors. Since that time, Omega professors have begun to assign higher grades in their classes, and overall stu 89
- Scandals are useful because they focus on attention on problems in a way that no speakers and reformer ever could.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, b 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 325, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'deprived'.
Suggestion: deprived
...t is likely that most of the people are deprive of the facilities as well as impeded by...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 475, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ffect the overall performance over that period of time; it will ultimately hamper the teacher&...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, thus, well, for instance, in addition, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 84.0 58.6224719101 143% => OK
Nominalization: 31.0 12.9106741573 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2914.0 2235.4752809 130% => OK
No of words: 534.0 442.535393258 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45692883895 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80712388197 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2700983446 2.79657885939 117% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.449438202247 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 919.8 704.065955056 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.007274581 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.761904762 118.986275619 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4285714286 23.4991977007 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.52380952381 5.21951772744 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223253908172 0.243740707755 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0877555415834 0.0831039109588 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0579363189083 0.0758088955206 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148481244534 0.150359130593 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0456534459367 0.0667264976115 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 14.1392134831 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 48.8420337079 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.1639044944 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 141.0 100.480337079 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.