Joint family
The term independence has been a topic of discussion in the society for a quiet number of times. Some people would prefer getting independent from their parents quickly whereas other want to live up with their families for a bit longer. Personally, talking about my opinion I would prefer to stay with my parents rather than to get independent. I feel so for two strong reasons, which I will explain in the following essay.
First of all, I would prefer to live in a joint family because joint families are very interesting and we never feel bored and they would support us during difficult times. Our parents would always be providing us with several new ideas and knowledge, which we require throughout our life. For instance, when we are living in large families then we would be benefited in several ways. Last year when I was sick, I was able to recover easily and in a faster rate because of the care and support from the family members. Had I lived alone then I would have faced several difficulties and I would not have been recovered so fast. Family actually provides a type of confidence in you that you are not alone which would in turn help you in several aspects.
Similarly, our families would also be in some difficulties and they may not express. We should always understand their feelings and should support them. Living together in family would allow us to identify their problems and we can help them in any difficult situations, My friend Ramesh experience is a compelling example of this. Ramesh use to live with his parents in Kathmandu where he was doing his job. His father was suffering from a rare kind of disease and his father shared his problem with Ramesh. Since, Ramesh knew about the fathers problem in time he was able to take his father to hospital in time. This allowed the doctors to identify the illness and was treated. Had Ramesh not lived with his father then there was a possible risk of losing his father.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that it is a better idea to live with families for a longer time rather than living separately. This is because parents are the only one who could actually help us in difficult situations and children are the only hope for parents in their old age. Living together would help both the parents and their child positively.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? “Overall, the widespread use of the internet has a mostly positive effect on life in today’s world.” Use reasons and details to support your opinion. 3
- Young people enjoy life more than older people do. 66
- The widespread use of the internet has given people access to information on a level never experienced before. How does this increase in the availability of information influence life in today's world?" 76
- young people enjoy life more than older people do 70
- Joint family 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 340, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...is a compelling example of this. Ramesh use to live with his parents in Kathmandu w...
^^^
Line 5, column 510, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... father shared his problem with Ramesh. Since, Ramesh knew about the fathers problem ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 539, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'fathers'' or 'father's'?
Suggestion: fathers'; father's
...th Ramesh. Since, Ramesh knew about the fathers problem in time he was able to take his...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, if, may, similarly, so, then, whereas, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, kind of, talking about, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1907.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 408.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67401960784 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49433085973 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44450001138 2.67179642975 91% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.477941176471 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 602.1 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.9755433754 48.9658058833 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.8095238095 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4285714286 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 5.45110844103 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169105078976 0.236089414692 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0522142219983 0.076458572812 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0911590069612 0.0737576698707 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0973609111081 0.150856017488 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0829076903745 0.0645574589148 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 10.9000537634 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.29 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.