Some parents buy their children whatever they ask for, and allow their children to do whatever they want. Is this a good way to raise children? What consequences could this style of parenting have for children as they get older?
It is true that some parents tend to spoil their children too much by giving them everything they want. Personally, I hold a firm belief that this is not a good parenting style, which can lead to several negative effects on the behavioral and personality development of their children when they grow up.
On the one hand, there are two main reasons why parents should not adopt this way of upbringing. Firstly, if parents fulfill all their children’s demands, they will get used to this and do whatever they want outside. This means that children still keep this behavior in class when they interact with their peers, which makes them difficult to adapt to their surrounding environment and leads to a lack of social skills. Secondly, children would lack respect towards their older relatives including their parents due to getting familiar with doing whatever they want. They do not follow a strict rule and obey their older family members.
As a result, this parenting style would exert some detrimental effects on their children. One of the major consequences is that this is more likely to contribute negatively to shaping their personality during childhood and teenage years. In fact, they would behave more aggressively and improperly to their surrounding people. This could lead some unpleasant experiences occurring in their process of maturity such as violent actions including hitting their classmates when it comes to argument. Another possible effect would be they are less likely to become good members of the society in the future. Due to the fact that they get used to having whatever they want, they would fail to control their negative emotions such as anger, which could be a contributing factor to committing a crime in some cases.
In conclusion, it seems to me that lenient parents should change the way they educate and nourish their children unless they want their children to become negative parts of the community in the future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-06 | Arezooo | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-06 | el-naz | 61 | view |
| 2019-07-28 | spumoni | 61 | view |
| 2019-06-09 | Falola helen Oluwatoyin | 61 | view |
| 2019-04-10 | 0102mickey | 61 | view |
- The charts below show reasons for travel and the main issues for the travelling public in the US in 2009. 89
- Nowadays some employers think that formal academic qualifications are more important than life experience or personal qualities when they look for new employees Why is it the case Is it a positive or negative development 84
- In education and employment some people work harder than others Why do some people work harder Is it always a good thing to work hard 91
- Nowadays some employers think that formal academic qualifications are more important than life experience or personal qualities when they look for new employees Why is it the case Is it a positive or negative development 78
- It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops. Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view? 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, still, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, in some cases, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 24.0651302605 212% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1646.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08024691358 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59602946798 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530864197531 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 486.9 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0947806805 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.571428571 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1428571429 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.92857142857 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.57952016681 0.244688304435 237% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.231348769552 0.084324248473 274% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115971953878 0.0667982634062 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.401814923551 0.151304729494 266% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.059332410669 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.