The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.
the graph illustrates the frequency of visiting fast food restaurants of American people over the course of 10 years starting from 2003.
Overall, it is immediately clear that once a week and once or twice a month were the two most popular choices among the given categories. By contrast, the opposite was true for everyday choice.
Looking at the graph in detail, in 2003, the American usually went to fast food eateries once a week or once or twice a month, at around 30%. The figures for two categories witnessed an opposite trend over the rest of the period. More specifically, once a week increased gradually to 33% then declined to 27% in 2013, while its counterpart experienced a decrease of 5% in 2006 and recovered to reach a peak at exactly the point of once a week in 2006.
Out of the remaining categories, the percentages of several times a week fluctuated from around 16% to 20% during 10 years. A few times a year witnessed a steady increase from 12% to 15%, whereas the proportions of every day and never went down with always less than 5% over the period.
- Some universities now offer their courses on the Internet so that people can study online. Is this a positive or negative development? 89
- The charts below show reasons for travel and the main issues for the travelling public in the US in 2009. 89
- The table below gives information about the problems faced by children in two primary schools in 2005 and 2015. 73
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 78
- In today s world of advanced science and technology we still greatly value our artists such as musicians painters and writers What can arts tell us about life that science and technology cannot 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
the graph illustrates the frequency of visi...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 892.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64583333333 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66632077835 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598958333333 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0617791667 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.5 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0899225865138 0.215688989381 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0399640744671 0.103423049105 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0684197963262 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.066979265268 0.15604864568 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0827329976454 0.0819641961636 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.99 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.