Some think that it is better to get information or advice from other people, while others believe one can get any information or advice from the Internet or books.
Discuss both the views and give your own opinion.
Few men and women deem that getting knowledge or advice from other humans is a good option, while others think that all the information or advice could be gotten from the cyberspace or books. Although, information, which is gotten from the Internet could be theoretical, I believe that advice should be gotten from other people because of their vast experience.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why people should take advice from the hyperspace or books. Firstly, the Internet or books are the ocean of knowledge of different topics in which information is given by experts with proper explanation. For example, if someone wants to learn a mathematical theorem then it could be learnt by numerous methods on the cyberspace. Secondly, as the Internet or online books are not affected by the geographical boundaries, people could get advice or knowledge from all around the globe. However, I think that advice should be taken from other people because no guaranty of authentication of information is rendered on the cyberspace.
On the other hand, when advice is taken from other people, it may have manifold benefits. Firstly, it is true that humans can understand each-other more effectively as compared to technological gizmos. To exemplify, if a child wants to become a police officer then the Internet will guide him; however, as the parents are aware with the real caliber of their child, they could give him advice that which profession is more suitable for him. Secondly, humans have the experience and abilities to understand others qualities and limitations which is not possible with the cyberspace or books. Therefore, they will give advice others as per the consequences or circumstances.
To recapitulate, though information could be gotten of spectrum of topics from around the world, I believe that it would be a better option to get knowledge from other people because of their adequate experience and analytical thinking. Furthermore, it is recommended that when people look for the information or advice, they should scrutinize all the facets of it.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-03-25 | Richa Dhiman | 84 | view |
- Plastic shopping bags contribute to the pollution of land and sea, some think that they should be banned.Do you agree or disagree? 56
- Some people say uniforms hinder children s personality at school and therefore it should be banned Do you agree or disagree 88
- Sugar consumption is too harmful Some say it is governments responsibility to limit sugar intake while others say it s individual who are responsible Discuss both the views and give your own opinion 64
- You have a Facebook friend living and he/she is curious to learn about a major news item in your country.write a letter to your Facebook friend. In your letter,describe a news story in your countryexplain why people are interested in itsay how the story p 78
- Many people support use of animals for testing medicines for humans. Others believe it is not appropriate to use animals for such experiments.Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 367, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...should scrutinize all the facets of it.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, while, for example, i think, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1749.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17455621302 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88151859261 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.458579881657 0.561755894193 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 551.7 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.768699196 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.928571429 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1428571429 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7142857143 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.395282182621 0.244688304435 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150067522702 0.084324248473 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102071249964 0.0667982634062 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.260249385724 0.151304729494 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0648247994857 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.