graph of global water consumption in three sectors (Agriculture, industrial use, domestic use) in 1900-2000 and table water consumption in two differen countires Brazil and Congo with three sectors of measuremen (Population, irrigated land, water consumption per person) in 2000.
The chart shows global water use in three different sectors over a hundred year period, and water consumption in two different countries in three aspects of comparison in 2000.
The three sectors of water use from 1900 had increased in 2000. The data sequentially agriculture was more dominant than industrial and domestic. developments indicated by water use in agriculture after 1900 increased until 2000 which hit a high off more than 3000 km^3 of usage. after that followed by two other sectors, industrial use experienced an increase to 1200 km^3 and domestic use increase to 500 Km^3 in 2000.
The specific use of water consumption in brazil and Congo shown more significant thorough the human population in country, where the population in brazil (178 million) was bigger than Congo (5.2 million). besides that, the other reason which influenced the water consumption was irrigation land where brazil had 26,500 km^2 than Congo which had 100 km^2. Other supporting data, the comparison of consuming water per person in the population and irrigated land result that Brazil had ratio which was higher totally 359 m^3 than that in Congo lower only 8 m^3.
Overall we can say that water consumption in brazil and Congo in two aspects, population and irrigated land can give calculation of water consumption per person given the data contribution to domestic use in global water use graph.
- graph of global water consumption in three sectors (Agriculture, industrial use, domestic use) in 1900-2000 and table water consumption in two differen countires Brazil and Congo with three sectors of measuremen (Population, irrigated land, water consump 56
- global water use and water consumption in Congo and brazil 56
- graph of global water consumption in three sectors (Agriculture, industrial use, domestic use) in 1900-2000 and table water consumption in two differen countires Brazil and Congo with three sectors of measuremen (Population, irrigated land, water consump 73
- graph of global water consumption in three sectors (Agriculture, industrial use, domestic use) in 1900-2000 and table water consumption in two differen countires Brazil and Congo with three sectors of measuremen (Population, irrigated land, water consump 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 65, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...er use from 1900 had increased in 2000. The data sequentially agriculture was more ...
^^^
Line 3, column 147, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Developments
... dominant than industrial and domestic. developments indicated by water use in agriculture a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 281, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: After
... high off more than 3000 km^3 of usage. after that followed by two other sectors, ind...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 202, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Besides
...lion was bigger than Congo 5.2 million. besides that, the other reason which influenced...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 3.15609756098 349% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1171.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 228.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13596491228 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67684389322 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486842105263 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 344.7 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.905459589 43.030603864 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.111111111 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3333333333 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.22222222222 5.23603664747 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.477899404923 0.215688989381 222% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.220017631619 0.103423049105 213% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.135443633285 0.0843802449381 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.323611451897 0.15604864568 207% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0842523898988 0.0819641961636 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.