In some countries around the world, voting is compulsory. Do you agree with the notion of compulsory voting?
Recently, the phenomenon of voting compulsion and its corresponding impacts of sparked a heated debate, although contested by many that the matter of high-level of public participation in the election is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that mandatory polling system can be plus and I will scrutinize this throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, compulsory voting system can provide the society with some noticeable effects which rooted in the fact of the merits of high social behaviour, as well as a political contribution, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, When I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the great advantages of the compulsory voting system in democracy quality of the country. Thus the beneficial ramifications of both democracy improvement and people's collaboration apparently can be seen.
On the other hand, within the realm of civil policy, obligatory voting might increase the consequence of non-voters disaffiliation. Moreover, fundamental aspects of low-public participation would relate to this reality that the demerits of unnecessary voting rules pertain to the chaos of community. as an example, some political survey undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of the political trouble is correlated negatively with voter’s satisfaction. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of the low-level of public responsibility.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of democratic free-choice voting systems far weigh its drawbacks, not only do the advantages of crowded polling places prove the significance of government’s popularity, but also pinpoint long-term implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | jenifer | 55 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | Daniel Torres | 77 | view |
| 2019-11-07 | smb.arami | 11 | view |
| 2019-11-06 | Daniel Torres | 80 | view |
| 2019-10-02 | Daniel Torres | 77 | view |
- Whether the design of the building will have a positive or negative impact on people’s life and work? 88
- More information available online so library books are useless, agree or disagree with statement? 85
- Some democrats claim that people who do not take part in voting processes do not have the right to complaint about the situation their communities are in. What is your position regarding this opinion? 85
- Experience is a more effective way to teach, compared to books? Agree or disagree? 88
- What is the best invention of last 100 years, the computer, antibiotics, the airplane, and explain why? 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 441, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...em in democracy quality of the country. Thus the beneficial ramifications of both de...
^^^^
Line 5, column 301, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: As
...ules pertain to the chaos of community. as an example, some political survey under...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1648.0 1207.87684729 136% => OK
No of words: 283.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.82332155477 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.47144686342 2.71678728327 128% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 139.433497537 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632508833922 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 379.143842365 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.5024630542 137% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 80.3361064528 50.4703680194 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 164.8 104.977214359 157% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.3 20.9669160288 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.6 7.25397266985 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181957968447 0.242375264174 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.061465451303 0.0925447433944 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0407277007332 0.071462118173 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0965749855521 0.151781067708 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0421049346428 0.0609392437508 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.1 12.6369458128 159% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 17.68 53.1260098522 33% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 6.54236453202 223% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.8 10.9458128079 163% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.77 11.5310837438 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.22 8.32886699507 135% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 55.0591133005 202% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 9.94827586207 201% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.3980295567 127% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 10.5123152709 190% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.