the bar graph below shows the number of television receivers per 1000 inhabitants in the world in 1970 and 1997.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar graph illustrates the number of TV receivers in the world between 1970 and 1997.
Overall, the amount of TV receivers rose significantly for all kinds of countries ( least developed, developing and developed )
There were nearly three times as many TV receivers in the world in 1997 as in 1970. Developed countries has the most remarkable changes during 27 years, the number increased from 263 to 548 TV receivers.
Followed by developing countries, which also has the significant changes from 1970 to 1997, almost sixteen times higher than beginning year.Although has the less number of TV receivers but least developed countries also has a great level. Between 1970 and 1997, the number increased from just 0,5 to 23 TV receivers
- a survey conducted for the places in which people gain access the internet from 1998 to 2005 77
- the bar graph below shows the number of television receivers per 1000 inhabitants in the world in 1970 and 1997 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 59
- The two maps below show in before and after the construction of some tourist facilitiessummarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 82, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...significantly for all kinds of countries least developed, developing and develope...
^^
Line 3, column 125, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...east developed, developing and developed There were nearly three times as many TV...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 141, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Although
...ixteen times higher than beginning year.Although has the less number of TV receivers but...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 33.7804878049 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 624.0 965.302439024 65% => OK
No of words: 121.0 196.424390244 62% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15702479339 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.31662479036 3.73543355544 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79993364934 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 69.0 106.607317073 65% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570247933884 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 165.6 283.868780488 58% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.0472558098 43.030603864 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.8 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178257581203 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137002785888 0.103423049105 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0973749281268 0.0843802449381 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145833198176 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10428649861 0.0819641961636 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 21.0 40.7170731707 52% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.