The table shows the proportion of pupils attending four secondary school types between 2000 and 2009
The table illustrates the percentage of student apply for four different secondary school types from 2000 to 2009.
Overall, three school types, namely Specialist Schools, Grammar Schools and Voluntary-controlled Schools, have seen the decrease of proportions of pupils, while Community Schools became more popular in secondary education system in the same period.
In details, Voluntary-controlled Schools accounted for the highest rate of four school types in initial year with 52%, then dropped sharply to 20% in 2009. Similarly, the number of student of Grammar Schools steadily collaspe by half (from 24% to 12%) in the same year. Speacialist Schools also had a decrease of pupils in nine year but in a relative small figure. (2%)
In terms of Community Schools, while only a small minority of 12% pupils in 2000, this figure rose toward to over the half, approximately 5 times higher during following nine years. (from 12% to 58%)
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-15 | reverjae | 84 | view |
| 2023-10-18 | Siska Umila Adha | 70 | view |
| 2023-07-31 | Chyka | view | |
| 2023-07-29 | Siska Umila Adha | view | |
| 2023-07-29 | Siska Umila Adha | 70 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ndary school types from 2000 to 2009. Overall, three school types, namely Spec...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... education system in the same period. In details, Voluntary-controlled Schools...
^^
Line 3, column 368, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... year but in a relative small figure. 2% In terms of Community Schools, while onl...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 185, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: From
...mes higher during following nine years. from 12% to 58%
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, second, similarly, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 7.0 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 784.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 150.0 196.424390244 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22666666667 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49963551158 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05589412266 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.613333333333 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 228.6 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.6802707612 43.030603864 160% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.0 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4285714286 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299047106508 0.215688989381 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129118505908 0.103423049105 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11489206348 0.0843802449381 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188732761254 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115445596304 0.0819641961636 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.