Some people believe that scientific discoveries have given us a much better understanding of the world around us. Others believe that science has revealed to us that the world is infinitely more complex than we ever realized.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
The author adduces that there are two different attitudes toward the understanding of the universe by scientific exploration. While there some people who believe that intellectual discoveries give the lucid understanding from the world; some other people possess this viewpoint that the knowledge aware us about the complicity of the world. In what follows, I will list the possible reasons for both groups; finally, I will posit my stand toward this prompt.
The group which holds the outlook that science brighten people’s understanding toward their surrounding may consider the achievement and development of human beings during the history. Indeed, it is lucidly obvious that there is a big gap between the modern individual and one from the stone age period. The primitive human was the submissive of nature and its laws. He just looked forward to gaining the advantage of nature according to its rules and conditions; consequently, he was a food seeker and gatherer, hunter, and lived in the cave. The whole of these conditions was for the sake of his futile unawareness. On the other hand, modern mankind is dominant in the world. He demolishes, constructs, and gain advantages based on his desire which could be against the natural laws. This superiority and controlling manner are appeared because of technological and scientific advancements. The achievements which overlook any barrier and men’s disability.
As mentioned, there some other people who support this thought that the knowledge of the universe depicts its complexity which mankind never can overcome them. Therefore, scientific discoveries are futile. This group may assume that despite the knowledgeable and scientific success, the world as an abysmal and chasm place will not be explored by human beings at all. Indeed, it is an undeniable fact that the world is an endless and mysterious place which owns lots of vague and complicated situations. Besides, since the current comprehensive knowledge and science are not sufficient source to deal and solve these ambiguities; therefore, the science cannot enlighten the man’s understanding from the world.
My attitude is generally aligned with the perspective took by the first group. First of all, from my perspective, their assumed adherent is a plausible and undeniable reality. In addition, the second group underestimates the fact of revealed inabilities of man beings’ knowledge for delving the universe is for the sake of understanding presented by the same knowledge. In fact, the science which is assumed to fail the reveal the intricacy of the universe highlights the immensity of the world. This is an understanding gained by science. Besides, although there is a list of the issues in the world which do not end to success by the field of science and its scientific and technological endeavors; the will be solved in the feature. In addition, it is not fair to overlook the achievements by the knowledge and only bolds its failures for revealing the world mysteriously.
To wrap it up, all the discussed arguments illustrate that my thought is close to the first group which believes the knowledge gives a better understanding of the world.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-20 | Anirudha Balaji Shirsikar | 66 | view |
- tpo34 86
- tpo 3 80
- Claim: Researchers should not limit their investigations to only those areas in which they expect to discover something that has an immediate, practical application.Reason: It is impossible to predict the outcome of a line of research with any certainty.W 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In the past young people depended on their parents for making decisions. Today, young people are better able to make decisions on their own. 70
- 23 Governments should offer college and university education free of charge to all students Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In dev 64
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 421, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...t, the science which is assumed to fail the reveal the intricacy of the universe highlight...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 170, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es a better understanding of the world.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, consequently, finally, first, if, look, may, second, so, therefore, while, as for, in addition, in fact, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.3162921348 168% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2695.0 2235.4752809 121% => OK
No of words: 509.0 442.535393258 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29469548134 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74984508646 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04501045184 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 215.323595506 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.485265225933 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 828.9 704.065955056 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.0401998459 60.3974514979 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.8 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.36 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 5.21951772744 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236689701137 0.243740707755 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0625769522415 0.0831039109588 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0688068309461 0.0758088955206 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14572334011 0.150359130593 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0505530075075 0.0667264976115 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.1392134831 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 100.480337079 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.