Some people believe that it is good to share as much as information as possible in scientific research, business and academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too invaluable to be shared freely.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Knowleadge is the most powerful tool in hands of mankind, thus the access to this knowledge remains the main issue of many disputes. While some people claim that particular information should be restricted to share so as to maintain global peace and preserve the value of information, other people support the idea of open access to the information. From my view, despite of the fact that knowledge should be spread, there is some particular information that had better be kept away from public.
On the one hand, opening essential information to the community could be effective. In scientific world, trustworthy and reliable sources of information have its own value. In other words, without free access to previous findings, researchers and scholars could not advance existing technologies and improve human's life. For example, if discoveries in medicine were not shared, people in developing countries would still struggle with severe illnesses and lack of qualitative treatment.
On the other hand, I would argue that the security of wide variety of people can be vulnerable straightforward due to imparting vigorous information. Firstly, though scientific facts about medical treatments have been essential for saving people, I personally believe that there must be a strict surveillance and reporting about legal accessibility just for whom are eligible to reach these facts. For example, manipulation of some viruses by convicts may lead to a catastrophic problem of creating a fatal disease. Secondly, at the workplace, there is no doubt that the sense of competition plays an active role in creating creativity and innovations. As a result, sharing discoveries seemingly destroy and discourage many firms and industries.
In conclusion, it seems to me that , on the type of information, there must be a serious and legal regulation on sharing information.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-06 | Sheetal Bataniya | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-23 | lipsa pipaliya | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-23 | lipsa pipaliya | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-07 | tamimadnan6240 | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-03 | kuldeep sharma | 93 | view |
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries. 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational setting in the UK in 2010.Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- In some countries, children are expected to study more time both in and after school. Advantages and disadvantages of this trend. 78
- The Internet will never replace traditional course books in schools How far do you agree with this prediction 54
- In some countries, children are expected to study more time both in and after school. Advantages and disadvantages of this trend. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 216, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...formation should be restricted to share so as to maintain global peace and preserve the ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 35, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
.... In conclusion, it seems to me that , on the type of information, there must ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, thus, while, as to, for example, in conclusion, no doubt, as a result, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1582.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41780821918 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06881930451 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619863013699 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4471537831 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.692307692 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4615384615 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.1538461538 7.06120827912 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220092071724 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0682405746683 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0513136679501 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11998406701 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.041425472159 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.