Schools should ask students to evaluate their teachers. Do you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Nowadays, there are many schools which are offering the students to evaluate the teacher on the basis of some factors although others are barely taking the review from students. I think that if the students get a scope of giving feedback on the virtues of a teacher, it will be more beneficial to the school as well as the teacher. The teachers can find out the optimum ways of making the lesson easier to the students. In addition, students will learn about providing their opinions at the beginning of the formative years. My next sentences will put light on these positive sides of participation of the students on giving feedback on their teachers.
First and foremost, there are some schools who barely care about the learning of the students. They don't realize what is the impression of a teacher to the students. It has many consequences such as students may deviate from the studies. Also, it may create some negative impression about the school and the teachers. By considering these issues, I think that school should arrange taking a feedback system weekly or monthly from the students. According to my view, the school can give a feedback sheet to the students and review the paper after taking the student's opinion. As a result, the school authority can discuss with the teachers in a meeting to overcome their limitations.
Secondly, School period is the best of learning. If the students get a scope of giving their opinion whether something is right or wrong, It will assist them to judge properly in the future. Moreover, the relationship between the teacher and the student will be strong. On the other hand, many students may become frustrated by the pressure of over assignments. They cannot pursue extracurricular activities. But, if they can express their wishes then the teacher will understand and give them the opportunities to flourish physical and cognitive abilities.
In conclusion, receiving a review on the teachers is not underestimating the teacher, rather it helps them to find out their lackings so that they can take care if their students. Sometimes, teachers should come forward to take the feedbacks from the students.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-12 | Pandalove | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | Majid1369708090 | 76 | view |
| 2019-10-22 | gaoxiangluke | 76 | view |
| 2019-10-22 | swapnil.paliwal | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-26 | S_Daftari | 80 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Boys and girls should attend separate schools. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 68
- If You could change one important thing about your hometown, what would you changes?? Use reasons and specific examples to support your answer. 90
- Many people have difficulty maintaining a healthy diet. What are the reasons and solutions? 78
- Some people prefer to work for a large company. Others prefer to work for a small company. Which would you prefer? Use specific reasons and details to support your choice. 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? A zoo has no useful purpose. Use specific reasons and examples to explain your answer. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 101, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...bout the learning of the students. They dont realize what is the impression of a tea...
^^^^
Line 3, column 558, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...s and review the paper after taking the students opinion. As a result, the school author...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, well, i think, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1807.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 360.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01944444444 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74111218079 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 212.727598566 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.475 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 536.4 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.3038836151 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.35 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.95 5.45110844103 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151262509068 0.236089414692 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0533909349361 0.076458572812 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0300119347033 0.0737576698707 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103183666125 0.150856017488 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0321676931681 0.0645574589148 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.54 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 61.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.