News stories on TV and in newspapers are very often accompanied by pictures.
Some people say that these pictures are more effective than words.
What is your opinion about this?
Images tend to be more eye catchy than the words. News articles are often published in paper or media along with the relevant photographs. Few audience think pictures convey more information than words. In this essay I would like to discuss my opinion that info-graphics are informative but words have their own prominence.
Now-a-days all the media and news channels are more relaying upon the photographs. Every day they come up with innovative ideas to attract the audience. One such attempt is usage of the images in news converges. For instance, the adverts and news with images are attractive to the teenagers due to their narrative mode. So, many TV shows and newspapers are using images to cover the news stories.
Because, it takes less time to go through the postures, most of the people feel that they are more effective. While present generation are very busy in their lives, they don’t have much time to know what is happening around them. However, with in the limited time available everyone is interested to read through the newspapers and media, which has become quite easy with the help of related images. For instance, a picture showing the budget in detail is very easy to analyse in fewer seconds compared to big paragraphs. As, the images are time saving, many people feel that they are effective than words.
Although many people feel that words are less important than images, written articles have their own significance in my opinion. Images can not disclose the entire information as it is a small resource. For example, a photo about statistics may not be so detail to understand all the required information. But, content can efficiently deliver the message irrespective of the images. Hence, words convey the content completely while images can do the same in certain instances only.
Therefore, I believe that info-graphics and words have their own significant marks on delivering the news. Though some argue that graphs are more efficient, words are equally important.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-15 | bashirrezakarimi | 78 | view |
2020-01-02 | PALAK AHUJA | 78 | view |
2019-11-28 | amanda.mosby | 73 | view |
2019-11-01 | Kazimobarak | 61 | view |
2019-10-09 | olParya | 56 | view |
- In some countries, the average weight of people is increasing and health and fitness are decreasing.what are causes? what are the solutions? 56
- News stories on TV and in newspapers are very often accompanied by pictures.Some people say that these pictures are more effective than words.What is your opinion about this? 61
- Even though globalization affects the world's economies in a very positive way, its negative side should not be forgotten. Discuss 67
- In some countries, the average weight is increasing and health and fitness is decreasing. explain the causes and solutions? 89
- In some countries, the average weight of people is increasing and health and fitness are decreasing.What are the causes and what measures are to be taken to control it? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 140, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun audience seems to be countable; consider using: 'Few audiences'.
Suggestion: Few audiences
...ia along with the relevant photographs. Few audience think pictures convey more information ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, while, as to, for example, for instance, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1690.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10574018127 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65789608644 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564954682779 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 544.5 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.803978573 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 80.4761904762 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7619047619 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.09523809524 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208001708778 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0588995793515 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.048054548138 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107635247467 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0573805692824 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.