The graph shows the trends in consumption of fast foods in britian.
The line graph illustrates the information about the utilization of hamburger, fish and chips, pizza in britain from 1970 to 1990. The data is calibrated in gram per individual.
In general, the maximum person consumed fish and chips while pizza was consumed by least number of people.
From the linear graph, it is clear that in 1970, approximately 300 grams of pizza was used person. However, it showed a slight declining trend over the period and reached to roughly 210 grams per individual. After 1980, the consumption of pizza remained stable and rose steeply just 200 grams.
Movingahead, from 1970 to 1990, the consumption of hamburger and fish and chips experienced a significant inclining trend that is fish and chips came to near about 150 gram from 90 grams in 80s while hamburger utilization was 3 gram in 1970 and it grew to just above hundred gram untill 1985. Interestingly, over the next 10 years it rocketed to 500 gram per person. Moreover, hamburger consumption climbed moderately to 300 grams in 1990.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-07 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-03 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
- The diagrams below guve information on transport and car use in edmonton. 73
- The graph shows the trends in consumption of fast foods in britian 67
- Parents are the best teachers. Do yo agree or disagree. 56
- Many people believe that mobile phones cause more harms than the benefits and that’s why mobile phones should be restricted? To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give reasons to support. 78
- Participation by 5 to 14 years old in selected leisure activities in Australia 41
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 169, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
...s fish and chips came to near about 150 gram from 90 grams in 80s while hamburger ut...
^^^^
Line 7, column 229, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
...n 80s while hamburger utilization was 3 gram in 1970 and it grew to just above hundr...
^^^^
Line 7, column 351, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
...er the next 10 years it rocketed to 500 gram per person. Moreover, hamburger consump...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 859.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99418604651 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77867443914 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546511627907 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 67.6408452831 43.030603864 157% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.4444444444 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1111111111 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105169337182 0.215688989381 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0466676380449 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0378888749969 0.0843802449381 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0636780703855 0.15604864568 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0529706949091 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.