Television is dangerous because it destroys family life and any sense of community; instead of visiting people or talking with our family members we just watch television.
It is certainly true that we prefer to watch television rather than getting along with our family or meeting people. Though I agree that it is not a positive impact, I believe it does not completely ruin any one's family life or society.
On the one hand, the idiot box is considered to be a dangerous tool which has a significant impact on both individuals and society. With regard to individuals, they get addicted to the programs telecasted and give low priority to the members of their family. Most Indian ladies who regularly watch mega serials have proven to have poor bonding with their family. At the same time, unknowingly it consumes more time than we expect. Consequently, we realise that we could have spent quality time with family or friends only at the later stage. Since everyone becomes a couch potato, there is less interaction with the neighbours and thus resulting in a community which is not really socially interactive.
On the other hand, television is not the only cause for problems in family and community. It is a well-known fact that internet access and other electronic gadgets like mobile phones, computers and laptops contribute to a great extent. Therefore, there becomes less necessity for people to communicate directly with the advent of group chats, video calls, free messaging and instant reply. Moreover, hectic work schedule drives more people towards entertainment to unwind themselves and re-energize for the next day. This does not cause any disturbance in a family if its usage is kept under the limit and all other relationships are prioritised. In fact, many programs like 'family no 1 ' are being broadcast to insist the family values and mutual understanding .This is not all there are several events of social concern being exposed to public to create awareness. Thus television cannot be blamed entirely as it has its own benefits.
To conclude, the entertainment motto of television is appealed more and it is common to devote time for relaxation .This is not all our working hours have changed these days and by that time we would not have any one's company other than television. In my opinion, it would no way affect the relationship and socialisation if it is properly used in proper time
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-29 | Sai sushma | 61 | view |
- Multicultural societies, in which there is a mixture of different ethnic peoples, bring more benefits than drawbacks to a country. 76
- You live in a rented accommodation which was recently damaged due to the bad weather.Write a letter to the landlord. In your letter: - explain what caused the damage - why do you need them to fix the problem right away? - what needs to be d 73
- Longer life spans and improvements in the health of older people suggest that people over the age of sixty five can continue to live full and active lives In what ways can society benefit from the contribution that older people can make 89
- “Some experts opine that a new language should be introduced for all countries for international communication.”Do you think the benefits of introducing a new international language will outweigh the problems? 73
- Most people believe that money is a very important consideration when choosing a job as it can help you get better lifestyle; however, there are some who believe it is more important to have a job you enjoy and that this and not money will lead to greate 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 686, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... In fact, many programs like family no 1 are being broadcast to insist the family...
^^
Line 3, column 760, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...e family values and mutual understanding .This is not all there are several events...
^^
Line 3, column 762, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...family values and mutual understanding .This is not all there are several events of ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 866, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... exposed to public to create awareness. Thus television cannot be blamed entirely as...
^^^^
Line 4, column 115, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... is common to devote time for relaxation .This is not all our working hours have c...
^^
Line 4, column 116, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...s common to devote time for relaxation .This is not all our working hours have chang...
^^^^
Line 4, column 190, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...have changed these days and by that time we would not have any ones company other...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, if, moreover, really, so, therefore, thus, well, in fact, in my opinion, with regard to, on the other hand, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1866.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 377.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94960212202 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76059152207 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572944297082 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 610.2 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2471108256 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.764705882 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1764705882 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.47058823529 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257865748019 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0748549680655 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0624568894558 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157418462756 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.069206836307 0.056905535591 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.