Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere.
To what extent do you agree with this view?
Spending of common man’s tax money on the preservation of art has long been a point of contention between historians and the taxpayers and there have been multiple recordings in history regarding the same.
Preserving and promoting arts are two aspects, which kingdoms of past and governing bodies of the present, recognize to be revenue generating avenues, in the form of foreign tourism, cultural promotions and festivals, auctions (for auctioning works of art), and so on. Of late, governments take a very keen interest towards art and cultural activities and are pooling in funds, as it not only acts as a method of luring in foreign tourism, thereby bringing in revenue, but also, as a means to identify with our cultural background, which not only enables us to take root in our values more, but also enables to propagate the good values from our culture to the visitors of other cultural backgrounds. It has become a thing of such prime importance that governments across the world are setting up dedicated ministries, cabinets towards development and preservation of culture and art and indulging in more cross-country talks on imbibing the best of other cultures.
However, in the midst of this altruistic venture, it should not be forgotten, that finances are a very vital cog in the nation’s running and it has to be continually monitored despite, being it for good intentions. A cap should be fixed on the spending on Art promotion and preservation and this should be regularly tallied with the revenue that is getting generated out of it. Finally, it all boils down, to viability. As the old adage goes, it does not make any sense to starve the child and feed the pet. A government’s primary responsibility boils down to the welfare of the people and in the face of it, all other things, even art should take a backseat.
Art is still considered to be an integral and intrinsic part of any civilized society and not only represents the cultural identity of the society, but also, acts as a trace of the society’s origin and should be of national importance, however, welfare of the people, if not of greater importance, should be equally prioritized and the funds channelled accordingly.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-11-17 | divyadr93 | 56 | view |
2019-08-20 | daly.shaker.99@gmail.com | 73 | view |
2019-06-09 | Arun revanth | 61 | view |
2019-05-20 | marasheed1763@gmail.com | 56 | view |
2019-03-13 | RAndrewRubesh | 73 | view |
- The increase in mobile phones use in recent years has transformed the way we live, communicate and do business. Mobile phones can also be the cause of social or medical problems. What forms do these problems take?Do you think advantages outweigh the disad 56
- In Britain, when someone gets old they often go to live in a home with other old people where there are nurses to look after them. Sometimes, the government has to pay for this care.Who do you think should pay for this care, the government or the family?G 67
- Social networking sites such as Facebook and Twitter are observed to have more negative effects than positive being more useful for the criminals than others.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?Give reasons for your answer and incl 89
- Many newspapers and magazines feature stories about the private lives of famous people. We know what they eat, where they buy their clothes and who they love. We also often see pictures of them in private situations.Is it appropriate for a magazine or new 73
- You live in a room in college which you share with another student. However, there are many problems with this arrangement and you find it difficult to work.Write a letter to the accommodation officer at the college. In the letter,a) describe the situatio 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, finally, however, if, regarding, so, still, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 10.4138276553 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1852.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 372.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97849462366 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99341204423 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532258064516 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 582.3 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 37.0 20.2975951904 182% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 113.296248835 49.4020404114 229% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 185.2 106.682146367 174% => OK
Words per sentence: 37.2 20.7667163134 179% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.3 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152078854167 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0587163231166 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0414881398141 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0845879819288 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0357308598884 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.6 13.0946893788 157% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.92 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.7 11.3001002004 157% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.2 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 9.78957915832 184% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.8 10.1190380762 166% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.7795591182 167% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.