Claim: Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive.
Reason: It is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated.
Government is the governing body of any country’s overall development. The author claims that it is an incumbent of the government that it should financially support the major cities within the nation in order to preserve nation’s cultural heritage. I strongly disagree with the author’s claim and is described in the following 3 major points.
Firstly, cities are the place where people of different cultural background live. And in such places, it is very difficult and unwise to conserve the cultural traditions. If in a place like Kathmandu, the capital city of Nepal, where people of different cultural background live together in harmony, a specific traditional culture is given importance and tried to preserve, the objective of the project is certain to be failed. As people have already started to find the balance between different cultures and made their living, it would be illogical to invest in cities in order to conserve nation’s cultural traditions.
Secondly, the cultural traditions are pristine in rural part rather than in the major cities. So, it would be reasonable to support to the countryside, where the traditional culture are still in practice and not influenced by the western culture. For example, if mithila culture (an ancient traditional culture of eastern terai region of Nepal) is supported by government through various programs, it could introduce Nepal with the rest of the world and be a good touristic place, with ultimately increasing the economic standards of the rural life.
Furthermore, with the investment on the major cities, it is not sure that the countries different cultures will be protected. For example, a small country like Nepal (occupying only 0.3% of the total land of the world) also has a great diversity of cultures. Therefore, instead of investing more money in major cities, it would be wiser to invest on the rural part of the country in order to conserve the cultural heritage of the country.
Although, some may argue that, major cities which are rich in cultural heritages must be given more importance and conserved. It is only felt and not real because cities are the places where important people such as policy makers to journalist live and cities have got exaggerated and there are many more important Along places on the countryside which have never got importance are in the real need of the support. with this, the tradition of the country side is still in pristine stage while the culture of major cities is already mixed up. So, it will be wiser to support the rural tradition instead in the major cities.
- Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks. 58
- In your opinion, which of the following strategies is the best way for a student to prepare for a successful career?Studying specific academic subjectsTaking a part-time jobGetting to know other studentsUse specific reasons and examples to support your an 83
- Some people feel that high school students should be required to do volunteer work in their free time Others think that they should spend their free time studying and preparing for classes Which do you think is better Use specific reasons and examples to 78
- Government should provide free college and university education to all the students. 62
- College students should base their choice of field of study on the availability of jobs in that field. 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 417, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: With
...ce are in the real need of the support. with this, the tradition of the country side...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, while, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2185.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 428.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10514018692 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.548423998 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79405942284 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.457943925234 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 697.5 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.5265416676 60.3974514979 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.529411765 118.986275619 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1764705882 23.4991977007 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.52941176471 5.21951772744 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311115792457 0.243740707755 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111459681092 0.0831039109588 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0787371401294 0.0758088955206 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178763060322 0.150359130593 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0721454616105 0.0667264976115 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 100.480337079 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.