Nowadays, many medical research projects are funded by private companies. In your opinion, do you think that research should be carried out by private companies, individuals or government?
Nowadays, many medical research projects are funded by companies. In my opinion,I am going to talk about the fact that private companies and individual researchers can improve the medial lives of people more governments
Firstly, private companies are a good way to enhance medical research, but the government should be peering the companies, because, as you know, private companies always care about profits without caring the quality. Provided that the government peers over other companies, private companies could achieve good quality or standard. For example, when you find out about good private companies, you will find private companies which are peered under the government.
According to the opinion of many people, I personally agree with the opinion of many people, in that private companies which support researchers do well, because these companies support and care for the researcher. These companies always attempts to create and discover new invention in order to share this knowledge with other companies around the world
In contrast, people who work as individuals may work with a better mental mindset, not experiencing less stress because any inventor needs a relaxing life in order to invent new medical inventions. As you know, creating new medical inventions is not easy - it is very complex. This is why inventors need a relaxing life to be successful in their endeavors.
To sum up, I have talked with researchers who work with private companies and with those who have done research as individual and researchers are happier
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-16 | khaledsaed | 82 | view |
| 2019-03-16 | khaledsaed | 66 | view |
- A growing population is a big problem in many countries. Should the government provide new homes in the cities or in the countryside. 73
- Some say that the most important thing about being rich is that one has the opportunity to help other. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- what the benefits of studying at a private university? 60
- Some people prefer to plan activities for their free time very carefully.Others disagree. Discuss both views, and give you opinion. 67
- Some people prefer to plan activities for their free time very carefully.Others disagree. Discuss both views, and give you opinion. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 80, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , I
...s are funded by companies. In my opinion,I am going to talk about the fact that pr...
^^
Line 4, column 306, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mpanies, private companies could achieve good quality or standard. For example, w...
^^^
Line 6, column 271, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'invention'.
Suggestion: invention
... always attempts to create and discover new invention in order to share this knowledge with o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 355, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ge with other companies around the world In contrast, people who work as individu...
^^^^^
Line 10, column 154, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s individual and researchers are happier
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, so, well, for example, in contrast, you know, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 18.0 5.60731707317 321% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1323.0 965.302439024 137% => OK
No of words: 246.0 196.424390244 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37804878049 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73030626052 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560975609756 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 405.0 283.868780488 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 108.343190435 43.030603864 252% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 147.0 112.824112599 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3333333333 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1111111111 5.23603664747 212% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.396837223816 0.215688989381 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.187852956091 0.103423049105 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.148106467513 0.0843802449381 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220954082183 0.15604864568 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.132113932845 0.0819641961636 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.2329268293 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 61.2550243902 72% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.