Community online encyclopedia
From the beginning to the end professor has strong disagreement with the passage by denying three statement with clear explanation. Professor demonstrating real life example by demonstrating that there is no perfect thing in the world neither in communal nor traditional encyclopedia. In such manner, she illustrated following three example.
First of all, reading passage enlighten one of great disadvantage of online encyclopedia that contributors do not have sufficient academic knowledge, due to this issue in many cases most of article would be written by non-academic people with unreliable source. Nevertheless, lecturer denied this statement that even in traditional encyclopedia there are some unreliable information, she further giving example that there is not hundred percent, really compromised information does not exist.
Second, another disadvantage mentioned in passage explains about harassment and danger of hacker who could change information and corrupt it. Be that as it may, lecturer emphasize two solution that could improve the issue. First, if the contributor saved only file as ''read only'' format hackers can not change text, and secondly, the special editor controlled changes in texts.
Lastly, passage holds an opinion that internet based encyclopedia has lack of important information, instead articles demonstrated variety of information which could lead to give a false impression of what is essential. On the contrary, lecturer thinks that variety of information is advantage not disadvantage. She further explain that in traditional encyclopedia due to limited space it only write main information but in internet encyclopedia it wide space that could write immense information.
In conclusion, lecturer certainly denied that statement of reading passage that community encyclopedia have some important problem. She provide three strong statement to deny the statement mentioned in reading passage.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-02-15 | dawoodomidi | 68 | view |
| 2019-03-20 | tamir052222 | 80 | view |
| 2016-04-14 | Sura | 80 | view |
| 2015-08-31 | edsonsimoes | 70 | view |
| 2015-05-16 | bigzee | 80 | view |
- You are going to have a new roommate next semester. Which of the following qualities is most important to you: a) cleanliness b) humorous c) politeness? 76
- Community online encyclopedia 80
- liner graph 11
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is always better to study with a teacher then it is to study alone Support your response with reasons and examples 53
- The table below gives details of world electricity production by renewable sources in the four years between 2009 and 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 396, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[3]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'gives'.
Suggestion: gives
...ome unreliable information, she further giving example that there is not hundred perce...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 429, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
...urther giving example that there is not hundred percent, really compromised information...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 324, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[3]
Message: The pronoun 'She' must be used with a third-person verb: 'explains'.
Suggestion: explains
...advantage not disadvantage. She further explain that in traditional encyclopedia due to...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 394, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'writes'?
Suggestion: writes
...cyclopedia due to limited space it only write main information but in internet encycl...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 136, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'She' must be used with a third-person verb: 'provides'.
Suggestion: provides
...opedia have some important problem. She provide three strong statement to deny the stat...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, lastly, may, nevertheless, really, second, secondly, so, in conclusion, first of all, in many cases, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 5.01324503311 339% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1653.0 1373.03311258 120% => OK
No of words: 283.0 270.72406181 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.84098939929 5.08290768461 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12692298711 2.5805825403 121% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 145.348785872 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590106007067 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 419.366225166 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.55342163355 116% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 1.0 8.23620309051 12% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.9594537556 49.2860985944 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.153846154 110.228320801 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7692307692 21.698381199 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1538461538 7.06452816374 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177503862732 0.272083759551 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0518648382488 0.0996497079465 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0651569748207 0.0662205650399 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0855173004398 0.162205337803 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0529010613233 0.0443174109184 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.3589403974 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.8541721854 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.0289183223 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.59 12.2367328918 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.2008830022 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.