Integrated Writing (TPO 45)
In the reading section the writer claims that although a theory supports that Did bees exist on Earth as early as 200 million years ago, many skeptics reject this theory by providing several arguments including no evidence of actual bee fossils, absence of flowering plants during that era, and lacking of some details in those nests. However, in the reading section, the professor states that some scientist found lots of solid evidence which proves that Did bees lived on earth as early as 200 million years ago.
First of all, the writer contends that no fossil remains of actual bees have been found from 200 million years ago. In contrast, the professor rejects this notion by stating that it is true that scientist didn't find any remains of actual bee fossils, but this happened because there were not enough trees which produced resins that could preserve Did bees fossils. In fact, there were very rare trees which produced resins that excrete resin.
Furthermore, contrary to the idea in the reading part suggesting that the absence of flowering plants in that period reject the possibility that Did bees exist on earth as early as 200 million years ago, the lecturer mentions that before flowering plant Did bees fed on non-flowering plants such as pine trees and after flowering plants became available on Earth Did bees evolved and relied on flowering plant ever since.
In addition, even though the writer asserts that the fossilized structures found in Arizona are somewhat similar to nest chambers made by modern bees, but they lack some of the finer details, the professor mentions that scientist found the same chemical materials in fossilized nests and modern nests which proves that Did bees and modern bees used the same water proof material to build their nests.
- Integrated Writing (TPO 45) 70
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long. 70
- Integrated writing (TPO 46) 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Because people are busy doing so many different things, they do very few things well. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is important to know about events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 205, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
... stating that it is true that scientist didnt find any remains of actual bee fossils,...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 166, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...bers made by modern bees, but they lack some of the finer details, the professor mentions t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 359, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: waterproof
... Did bees and modern bees used the same water proof material to build their nests.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, so, in addition, in contrast, in fact, such as, first of all, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 12.0772626932 174% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1489.0 1373.03311258 108% => OK
No of words: 298.0 270.72406181 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9966442953 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.24418381037 2.5805825403 87% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 145.348785872 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496644295302 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 435.6 419.366225166 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 13.0662251656 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 42.0 21.2450331126 198% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 126.442372128 49.2860985944 257% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 212.714285714 110.228320801 193% => OK
Words per sentence: 42.5714285714 21.698381199 196% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.1428571429 7.06452816374 214% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.093143672462 0.272083759551 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0540165005995 0.0996497079465 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0176685835319 0.0662205650399 27% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0609060057594 0.162205337803 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0273193250123 0.0443174109184 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 23.4 13.3589403974 175% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.31 53.8541721854 69% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.5 11.0289183223 168% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.61 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 10.7273730684 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.8 10.498013245 179% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.2008830022 170% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.