GDP growth per-year for three countries between 2007 and 2010.
The chart below show the GDP growth per year for three countries between 2007 and 2010. Overall, it is clear from the charth that one of the coutries experienced increased in every year. It was Japan. It was significantly. Beside that one of the other countries was discreased. It was Tunisia. Tunisia was bigest GDP growth in 2007 but always experienced discrease, and percentage of Tunisia in 2010 was 3%, it was smaller rather than in 2007 and 2008 but in other years ecuador was smaller growth and the changes was irregular in every year. Beside that Japan changed structually and to be the biggest GDP growth in the last two years. Visibly from the chart that the biggest growth was Japan in 2010 and smsllest was found in ecuador contrie at 2009 with percentage 1%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-10 | garikapatideepthi | 61 | view |
- At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people. 67
- Some people believe that the university main aim is to help graduates for a better jobs. While others believe that university education bring benefits for individuals and society. Discuss both views and give your opinions. 73
- In some countries, it can be difficult for people over the age of 50 to get good jobs, despite their experience.What do you think are the causes of this problem, and what measure could be taken to sole it. 73
- Some people think it is more important for government to spend public money on promoting healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illness than to spend it on the treatment of people who are already ill. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- At present time, the population of some countries includes in relatively large number of young adults, compare with the number of older people. Do the advantages of this situation outweight the disadvantages. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 636.0 965.302439024 66% => OK
No of words: 136.0 196.424390244 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67647058824 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.41495297035 3.73543355544 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4461324604 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 70.0 106.607317073 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514705882353 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 174.6 283.868780488 62% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 70.1961977093 43.030603864 163% => OK
Chars per sentence: 70.6666666667 112.824112599 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1111111111 22.9334400587 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.777777777778 5.23603664747 15% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 1.0 3.83414634146 26% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.33917512998 0.215688989381 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144914039455 0.103423049105 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.236956459611 0.0843802449381 281% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.33917512998 0.15604864568 217% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.2 13.2329268293 62% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.63 61.2550243902 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.27 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.05 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 40.7170731707 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.4329268293 48% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 6.0 11.0658536585 54% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Minimum two paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.