This material addresses the question of survival of dinosaurs in the north of Alaska during its cold and dark winters. The reading passage suggests that dinosaurs migrated south to stay alive. The lecturer, on the other hand, refutes this information by stating that those animals stayed in the northern region of Alaska even in wintertime.
This material addresses the question of survival of dinosaurs in the north of Alaska during its cold and dark winters. The reading passage suggests that dinosaurs migrated south to stay alive. The lecturer, on the other hand, refutes this information by stating that those animals stayed in the northern region of Alaska even in wintertime.
To begin with, the reading passage highlights that the edmontosaurs were eating only plants, which proves the migration hypothesis since the North of Alaska lacked vegetation during cold period of year. Meanwhile, the professor casts doubt on this and argues that during the dinosaurs' era summerdays were warm and the sunshine was long enough for plants to grow and even feed the soil with nutrients; animals fed on those nutrients during winter.
Additionally, the article posits that the fact the dinosaurs were used to live in herds is another prove of the migration theory as it is easier to migrate collectively; moreover, the behaviorial pattern of modern animals supports that idea as well. However, the professor advocates a different approach and provides the following details. Namely, she mentions that the mere fact of living in herds is not enough to claim that dinosaurs were migrating. Living in herds is justified by other reasons, for example, by the need of extra protection from the predators.
Finally, the author invites attention to the fact that edmomosaurs were able to migrate taking into account the moving power of those animals, which was high. This goes counter to the information in the listenign passage, according to which, juvenile dinosaurs were apparently unable to cover long distances southward. Consequently, the herd would have stayed with the young in the northern part of Alaska for they would not survive alone.
- If people have the opportunity to get a secure job, they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Parents are more involved in their children's education than were parents in the past. 88
- This material addresses the question of whether genetically modified trees have more benefits as compared to natural ones. The reading passage suggests that there are some serious advantages to be considered. The lecturer, on the other hand, refutes this 78
- TPO 51Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 3
- The reading passage suggests that the mentioned explorer indeed reached the Noth Pole in 1909. The lecturer, on the other hand, refutes this information by stating that Peary's assertions are false. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 275, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'dinosaurs'' or 'dinosaur's'?
Suggestion: dinosaurs'; dinosaur's
...oubt on this and argues that during the dinosaurs era summerdays were warm and the sunshi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 440, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...laska for they would not survive alone.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, consequently, finally, however, if, moreover, so, well, while, for example, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 30.3222958057 155% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1510.0 1373.03311258 110% => OK
No of words: 289.0 270.72406181 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22491349481 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62734819492 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557093425606 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 419.366225166 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.6328020108 49.2860985944 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.833333333 110.228320801 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0833333333 21.698381199 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06452816374 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 4.45695364238 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.440176938441 0.272083759551 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.166256049274 0.0996497079465 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.185692589972 0.0662205650399 280% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.304851613818 0.162205337803 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.306209089721 0.0443174109184 691% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.3589403974 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 63.6247240618 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.