This material addresses the question of whether ethanol fuel is a good alternative to gasoline in the Northern America. The reading passage suggests that the disadvantages of ethanol fuel outweigh its advantages. The lecturer, on the other hand, refutes this information by stating that gasoline may be altered by ethanol fuel efficiently.
This material addresses the question of whether ethanol fuel is a good alternative to gasoline in the Northern America. The reading passage suggests that the disadvantages of ethanol fuel outweigh its advantages. The lecturer, on the other hand, refutes this information by stating that gasoline may be altered by ethanol fuel efficiently.
To begin with, the reading passage highlights that ethanol fuel will cause the same environmental problems as gasoline. This is because ethanol releases carbon dioxide, which leads to global warming. Meanwhile, the professor casts doubt on this and argues that ethanol will not add to global warming since the process of growing of plants such as corn - a source of ethanol, absorbs carbon dioxide as an element of its nutrition.
Additionally, the article posits that the production of large amounts of plants needed for ethanol will decrease significantly the source of animals' feeding. However, the professor advocates a different approach and provides the following details. Namely, he mentions that ethanol may be produced from the parts of the plants that are not used as food for animals.
Finally, the author invites attention to the fact that the prices of ethanol fuel and of gasoline are competitive because of the subsidies of government; consequently ethanol will cost much more without state financing. This goes counter to the information in the listening passage, according to which, in future the increase of ethanol production will drop the price for ethanol by 40 per cent since the more of product is produced, the lesser is its price.
- For success in a future job it is more important to relate well with others than to study hard in school 43
- The reading and the lecture are both about the decrease of literature readers.The author of the reading believes that the reading public is reducing, especially among young people, which is an important loss for culture in general, and for the future of l 76
- Written paragraph:In many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is toassemble a group of people into a team. Having a team of people attack a project offersseveral advantages. First of all, a group of people has a wider rang 80
- Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they know how to do well. 60
- "Ecocertified" wood for American people 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 25, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
This material addresses the question of whether ethanol fuel is a good alternative to g...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, finally, however, if, may, so, while, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1344.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 255.0 270.72406181 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27058823529 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78448503921 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 145.348785872 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552941176471 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 421.2 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.7322406209 49.2860985944 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.181818182 110.228320801 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1818181818 21.698381199 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.45454545455 7.06452816374 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.493219646278 0.272083759551 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.210276693779 0.0996497079465 211% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.203453706857 0.0662205650399 307% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.325449212785 0.162205337803 201% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.314557813164 0.0443174109184 710% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.8541721854 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.0289183223 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.