Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In the past, it was easy to identify what type of carrier or job would lead yours to a secure or successful carrier.
In the contemporary world, people are working hard and facing a lot of challenges for a better future. So, there is no shortage of debate about how the people were in the past selected better carrier. In my opinion, in the past, it was easy for people to chose a good job for a better future. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, people in the past had limited resources, which makes easy for them to pick the best option for their career. If the people had limited resources, they could think innovatively. What's more, that created a better platform to find a good job or to start a new company. My father Alex, who is a manager for a corporate company, is a good example. My dad completed his masters in computers and joined as a manager for a corporate company a few days after his graduation without an interview because that company needs an employee right away. For this reason, I do believe that even though the resources are limited, it is easy to select a career in the past.
Second, people were in the past, was easy to select a better job for their future security because they had limited competition for jobs. Olden time, most of them worked as farmers and a few applied for jobs and they got selected without competition. My Uncle Ram, who is working as a police officer at Texas is a good example. he completed his matriculation at Omak public school ten years ago. even though he just passed matriculation, he selected as a police officer because of less competition. I feel this is not possible in the contemporary world because of more educated people leads to high competition.
In conclusion, although some people disagree with my claims, I believe old is gold. In the past, even though people had limited resources, it is easy to pick a secured career without any competition.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-04-06 | Hibahtabbaa | 60 | view |
| 2019-03-30 | prem1234 | 60 | view |
- do you agree or disagrees with the following statement?Has the easiness of cooking improved life. Give examples and reasons to support your opinion. 70
- five days work week vs four-day work 70
- The widespread use of the internet has given people access to information on a level never experienced before. How does this increase in the availability of information influence life in today's world?" 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment-doing things they like to do-rather than doing things they should do.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- human believes on elephant 65
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 193, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...sources, they could think innovatively. Whats more, that created a better platform to...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 328, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...ice officer at Texas is a good example. he completed his matriculation at Omak pub...
^^
Line 3, column 396, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Even
...on at Omak public school ten years ago. even though he just passed matriculation, he...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, i feel, in conclusion, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1527.0 1977.66487455 77% => OK
No of words: 333.0 407.700716846 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.58558558559 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63265927511 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 212.727598566 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.489489489489 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 494.1 618.680645161 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.478596546 48.9658058833 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.8333333333 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.05555555556 5.45110844103 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131717764636 0.236089414692 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0453922092116 0.076458572812 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0450572760434 0.0737576698707 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0912407412467 0.150856017488 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0211527255106 0.0645574589148 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 11.7677419355 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 10.9000537634 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.18 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 86.8835125448 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.