People nowadays are buying wider range of household things (for example: TV, rice cooker) than in the past. Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
The demand for household goods is growing considerably in recent years. While this trend can be positive to some extent, I would argue that it is more negative.
On the one hand, purchasing more electronic products can be beneficial in some ways. Firstly, because of technological advances, there are an increasing number of cutting-edge products designed to make people’s life much more convenient. For example, instead of washing clothes by hands, people now can use washing machines which help to save time and energy. As a result, modern goods can help people to reach a higher living standard. Secondly, technological devices such as smartphone, laptop, and television are considered as a common mean of entertainment currently. Without these products, people may find it difficult to find an available source of entertainment at home.
On the other hand, I believe that the potential drawbacks of buying more household things are more significant. Primarily, people now tend to make many purchase decisions although they do not truly need it, which results in wasting a huge amount of money on unnecessary things. For example, in spite of the fact that my friend’s phone still works well, she usually changes it to the new one to catch-up with new trends. In addition, due to the growing consumption of household products, factories and production companies have to exploit natural resources to produce more goods. This will lead to a lack of natural resource and environmental degradation. Furthermore, the availability and the convenience of modern goods may result in human’s sedentary lifestyle, which is responsible for some serious ailments such as obesity, heart attack, and high blood pressure.
In conclusion, buying a wider range of household things have some positive impacts, I agree with the idea that the drawbacks of this tendency are greater.
- People nowadays are buying wider range of household things (for example: TV, rice cooker) than in the past. Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 84
- Some people think computers are more important in education Others believe teachers play a more important role Discuss both views and give your opinion 87
- Long distant flights uses more fuel than cars and brings pollution to the environment. We should discourage non-essential flight rather than limit the use of cars. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1591.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3389261745 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03249706789 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604026845638 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6495045754 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.066666667 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8666666667 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5333333333 7.06120827912 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180329346828 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0565476936743 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.054436286558 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129744620076 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0606731708341 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.