Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.
To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?
Household waste has become a global issue in the recent times. Some people are of the opinion that the best way to increase recycling is by authorities to come up with certain decrees. This essay strongly supports this view and it will explain with valid examples in the subsequent paragraphs.
Most of the People do not come with a sense of responsibility towards garbage collection and even prompt disposal. This is because there is no strict punishment against garbage which is recklessly thrown around or causing stench in the society due to not separating wet waste and dry waste. Therefore, the government must make strict laws for recycling household waste and if any individual does not follow the rules then the government should take legal action against them. This would certainly help in facilitating waste recycling. For instance, in line with the current new policy introduced by the government of India, there is a monthly fee of one thousand Indian rupees for collecting the waste from outside of individual’s home and if the waste is not properly disposed of in dustbin then there is a penalty of an extra five thousand Indian rupees. These kind of strict laws would certainly make recycling household waste far speedier.
Furthermore, how can people hold the government accountable? When they themselves are at fault largely. The governments main contribution could come in the form of educating, by holding large campaigns, free lectures etc., for its citizen to draw their attention towards the drawback of not introducing proper measures like for instance Kitchen garbage (biodegradable) could be separated from non-biodegradable waste. This way one could even start a vermiculture bin of his own to produce manure and compost waste. These kinds of large scale crusades can only be taken to a successful level only with the governments intervention.
To conclude, recycling household waste is solely the responsibility of the government which seems to influence the people largely. The stringent measures adopted by the government would certainly make the world a cleaner and greener place.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-01 | pawanchopra000 | 73 | view |
- Marriages are bigger and more expensive nowadays than in the past. Why is this the case? Is it a negative or positive development? 11
- Nowadays more and more people want to live by themselves. What are the reasons? Is it a positive or negative trend? 89
- In many countries people are having health problems because they choose to live a unhealthy life.What are the reasons for this?What can be done to solve this problem? 73
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.Why is this the case?What can be done about this problem? 84
- It is sometimes said that people who do work that is physically hard should be paid as much as people who do work that needs high-level qualifications. Do you agree or disagree? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 863, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'These kinds'?
Suggestion: This kind; These kinds
...f an extra five thousand Indian rupees. These kind of strict laws would certainly make rec...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 62, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...people hold the government accountable? When they themselves are at fault largely. ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 606, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...ken to a successful level only with the governments intervention. To conclude, recycling...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, so, then, therefore, for instance, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1787.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27138643068 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95295117486 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563421828909 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 553.5 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 80.3025528859 49.4020404114 163% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.6875 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1875 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280079855519 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0858692652081 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.06378322758 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161097913677 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0414217302722 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.