The map shows proposed plans for the development of the old college campus to be completed by 2016.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The given map illustrates some suggested constructions to modernize the old college campus that can be finished in 2016.
Overall, it is clear that the planned campus will add 7 new changes to the present's that only has two facilities (main college building and parking lot).
In the center of the new campus, there would be a sports complex constructed on a part of the present parking lot. This new complex will be situated near the motorway so the surrounding air quality, consequently, will be affected badly by the cars' fumes. Another change of the new campus will be the construction of a library center and faculty office situated in front of the college entrance. These locations can easily be seen and accessed. As the main college building will be expanded, more classes will be carried out.
In the outside of the new campus, a new footbridge would be built over the River Thames in front of the entrance to give students easy access to the planned Student Union and dormitory. The school will make use of the abandoned area to build up more places for students' gathering and accommodation.
- One of the consequences of improved medical care is that the people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing. Do you think the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 61
- The maps below changes in the Spanish city of Castellon in recent times Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The map below shows three proposed sites for a new hypermarket A B and C in the city of Pellington Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 80
- The map shows proposed plans for the development of the old college campus to be completed by 2016 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 1.00243902439 1097% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 919.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83684210526 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67273605235 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568421052632 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6900943203 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.111111111 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1111111111 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.77777777778 5.23603664747 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196237427042 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.092068558024 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0493834360821 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135524383655 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0447235438912 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.