Some people think that the age limit for driving should be increased to make driving safer.
To what extend do you agree or disagree?
Traffic safety measures have long been on the government’s agenda worldwide. While I agree with the view that raising the legal driving age can improve traffic safety, I believe that there are a range of other measures which can be taken to make our road safer.
On the one hand, increasing the age limit for driving can help curb driving offenses. This might be explained by the reason that older drivers would be more mature and responsible with their manner, so they would be more clearly aware of traffic laws and demonstrate improved law compliance. There have been numerous road accidents which are the inevitable consequences of reckless driving caused by young people who drive their private vehicle while intoxicated or use a mobile phone while driving. These careless drivers not only endanger themselves, but also cause death of innocent lives on the road. Another reason is that as older drivers are more experienced, they can know how to respond quickly in dangerous situations. For example, if the brakes of a car suddenly stop working, a young driver might panic and not be able to handle it, and an accident is more likely to occur.
On the other hand, the government and local councils should consider other road safety measures that would help achieve better outcomes. Firstly, strict punishments should be rigorously imposed on those who disobey road regulations. Heavy fines, the confiscation of driving licenses or even prison sentences are severe penalties which can act as a deterrent, so that driving offenders could know the serious consequences of their risky actions and would think twice before committing traffic offenses. Secondly, it is essential to educate people properly before they start to drive in order to equip them with sufficient driving skills and knowledge. These educational programs which could be done in schools or in more difficult tests would encourage car drivers and motorists follow the road rules and drive more carefully. This could ensure both of pedestrians and drivers remain safe in their travels.
In conclusion, while I accept that increasing the legal driving age could help reduce traffic accidents, I believe that a variety of road safety measures should be integrated to promote better driving habits.
- The only way to improve road safety is to give much stricter punishments on driving offenses. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- More and more people are becoming seriously overweight. Some pp think a solution can be to increase the price of fattening foods. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- When visiting foreign countries some people think that it is advantageous to learn their cultures and traditions. How do you think people can learn other cultures and traditions? Why do you think that some people are interested in learning those tradition 73
- There are social, medical and technical problems associated with the use of mobile phones. What form do these problems take? Do problems of using mobile phones outweigh the benefits? 89
- The only way to improve road safety is to give much stricter punishments on driving offenses To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 7.85571142285 242% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1907.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 366.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21038251366 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64789623562 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551912568306 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 594.9 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.6414713441 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.133333333 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.46666666667 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252180448514 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.087164355139 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0852130847976 0.0667982634062 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168808159401 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0252183413135 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.