Marriages are bigger and more expensive nowadays than in the past. Why is this the case? Is it a positive or negative development?
Nowadays, people are spending more money on extravagant weddings than the older days. Comparison with others, and inspiration from the celebrities are the main root causes for this phenomenon. Expensive marriages have negative impact on the society. Individuals are in debts, along with that, it also leads to stressful life.
There are some unfavourable factors that result into luxurious marriage. First of all, most of the people are working, and after looking at their colleagues’ opulent ceremonies they start comparing with them, and they want to show-off that their big day could be more lavish. In this way, they could present about their superiority. Next, today, young couples are more inspired by celebrity’s nuptial ceremony. They are following them on social media, so that they can replicate their wedding like them. As a result, they will be satisfied that they are following footsteps of well-known personalities. In a report of ‘The Times of India’, it was demonstrated with statistics that individuals are spending a lot on destination weddings because they are influenced by famous people.
The trend of affluent marriages is negative, and it has detrimental effect on society. People are in debts because they do not have enough funds to spend on these occasions. Nevertheless, they are crossing their limits, and taking help of loans for magnificent wedding rituals. Another impact is stressful life. Groom and brides want to portray that their wedding is planned splendidly, and there are no loopholes. Therefore, they are spending sleepless nights, similarly, they are always in the pressure to prove it. In a survey conducted, it evidently proved that newly-wed are in tension, because they want to show that their wedding is upscale.
In conclusion, men and women are motivated with stars, along with that they are always comparing to depict classy wedding. However, these cases have unfriendly impacts like stressful life, and owing money.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-15 | Andi777 | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-20 | NAVNEET BALI | 67 | view |
| 2019-05-03 | Andi777 | 73 | view |
| 2019-04-11 | VT | 11 | view |
| 2019-04-08 | Richa Dhiman | 84 | view |
- Some governments say how many children a family can have in their country. They may control the number of children someone has through taxes. It is sometimes necessary and right for a government to control the population in this way. Do you agree or disag 11
- In some parts of the world, the rate of divorce has increased dramatically over the past few decades.Explain some possible reasons for this problem and suggest some solutions. 78
- Some people believe that all children should have a pet or an animal to look after. Other people disagree, however, saying that this depends on a child’s circumstances. Consider these opposing views, and give your own opinion. 67
- Some governments say how many children a family can have in their country. They may control the number of children someone has through taxes. It is sometimes necessary and right for a government to control the population in this way. Do you agree or disag 11
- In some parts of the world, the rate of divorce has increased dramatically over the past few decades.Explain some possible reasons for this problem and suggest some solutions. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, look, nevertheless, similarly, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 13.1623246493 190% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 24.0651302605 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1679.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38141025641 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87312347644 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580128205128 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 0.809619238477 865% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.7897914043 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.95 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.9 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.071780467311 0.244688304435 29% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0287046257321 0.084324248473 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0498503344585 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0580564747924 0.151304729494 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0590719123847 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.