It is impossible to help all people in the world, so governments should only focus on people in their own countries. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Many people claim that governments should only support their local citizens instead of helping residents in other countries. While it is true that the government need to focus on their own people, I believe it is also possible to provide support for others around the world.
To begin with, there are some reasons why governments should help people in their own nations. Firstly, because of an increasing number of homeless people in local communities such as people who do not have their own houses live under bridges or metro stations, authorities should prioritize to help <span style="font-size: 19.36px;">impoverished </span>people who cannot afford shelters. For example, the government could provide public houses and free food. Secondly, due to transitional economy, the unemployment rate has increased dramatically. For instance, in Vietnam, the labour-intensive economy has developed to knowledge-based economy that required many of educated employees. Therefore, authorities should take care of unemployment seriously. For example, governments could provide job training for unemployed individuals. This could help to reduce the number of jobless people.
However, I would argue that we can also support civilians coming from other parts of the world. First, because there are a great number of undeveloped countries where citizens live in a poor standard of living such as Haiti or Ethiopia, governments of developed nations need to support these poorer countries. This might help them overcome difficult situations. For example, when people in African countries are dying from curable diseases, richer countries could donate medicines and provide medical support. Additionally, diplomacy plays an essential role in the growth of economy. For instance, Japan usually provide untied loans for many developing countries. This could improve diplomatic relations between nations and make sure the sustainable development of countries.
In conclusion, it is true that governments could support their citizens, I believe it is also possible to help people in the world.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-23 | Kaur_Aman | 67 | view |
| 2021-10-14 | KRAA | 61 | view |
| 2021-10-11 | Raju godara | 61 | view |
| 2020-08-26 | nhanhanha | 90 | view |
| 2021-10-12 | ujjwalsatyam9211@gmail.com | 86 | view |
- The following appeared in a letter to the editor of the Balmer Island Gazette."On Balmer Island, where mopeds serve as a popular form of transportation, the population increases to 100,000 during the summer months. To reduce the number of accidents i 75
- Sending criminals to prison is the best method of dealing with them. Education and job training are a better way to help them. Do you agree or disagree? 67
- The following appeared in a memo from the director of student housing at Buckingham College."To serve the housing needs of our students, Buckingham College should build a number of new dormitories. Buckingham's enrollment is growing and, based o 66
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities. 83
- Tusk University should build a new recreational facility, both to attract new students and to better serve the needs of our current student body. Tusk projects that enrollment will double over the next 10 years, based on current trends. The new student bo 32
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1785.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.75806451613 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31204248013 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558064516129 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 540.9 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 60.5583332696 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.1666666667 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2222222222 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.38888888889 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271248149938 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0846921943496 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0937724468739 0.0667982634062 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202980234373 0.151304729494 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0754923934358 0.056905535591 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.83 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.