Technology, while apparently aimed to simplify our lives, only makes our lives more complicated.
Over human history, technology has improved and increased drastically. Technology has advanced society by making mundane tasks easier and saving lives.
Before calculators and modern-day computers, scientists and students used to spend hours solving complicated calculations that now calculators solve in the matter of minutes. This has sped up scientific discoveries leading to an exponential curve of developments. These developments increasingly help simplify the daily lives of average people: a parent that needs to decide on a quick recipe, a surf instructor that needs to check the ocean swell, or a customer that needs to calculate a tip. Ultimately, developments in technology makes life easier on the average person.
Advancements in technology have also had a huge impact in the medical field. Without many technologies, vaccines for diseases like polio, measles, and rabies or treatments for diseases like AIDS would not exist, leaving many people to solemnly accept their fates. Many more people and their families and friends would have to struggle with the emotional stress and burdens accompanying medical issues and complications. Clearly, such medical discoveries have saved the lives of many, thus improving the quality of life of such people and their families.
Despite such positive impacts technology has had on many people's lives, one cannot deny the distraction some technologies (including cell phones or gaming devices) pose on people. Such distracting technologies can pull people away from their responsibilities and obligations, or simply waste time.
All in all, technology has an overall positive effect on society. Most would agree that improving and saving lives outweighs the few negative effects of technologies.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-17 | Siddiqur Rahman | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | phajaygv | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-03 | Evil-wasp | 75 | view |
| 2019-10-10 | raolitesh@gmail.com | 66 | view |
| 2019-09-29 | xipaheje | 16 | view |
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be 50
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 62
- Technology, while apparently aimed to simplify our lives, only makes our lives more complicated. 16
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 58
- The following appeared as part of a letter to the editor of a scientific journal."A recent study of eighteen rhesus monkeys provides clues as to the effects of birth order on an individual's levels of stimulation. The study showed that in stimul 29
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, thus, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 19.5258426966 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 33.0505617978 33% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 58.6224719101 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 12.9106741573 8% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1495.0 2235.4752809 67% => OK
No of words: 264.0 442.535393258 60% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.66287878788 5.05705443957 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.55969084622 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02216473462 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 215.323595506 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.628787878788 0.4932671777 127% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 704.065955056 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.5678469272 60.3974514979 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.785714286 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8571428571 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.71428571429 5.21951772744 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0645464457427 0.243740707755 26% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0233707052521 0.0831039109588 28% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0278668379142 0.0758088955206 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0369488386831 0.150359130593 25% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0167055049738 0.0667264976115 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 14.1392134831 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 48.8420337079 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.1639044944 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.03 8.38706741573 120% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.