Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? To solve the problems of the present and the future, people should review the past.
As the living tempo quickens, there are a lot of problems coming along with the development and amelioration of people's living standard. Considering this situation, there is a controversial statement that, to fix the problems in the present and the coming future, people need to review and learn from the past we did. On the one hand, people agree with this statement since they think the past when we made mistakes is our teachers. However, there is a considerable number of people are in the opposite. In my opinion, I do agree with this statement. Herbert.A.Simon said the life without review and reflection is not worth to live. So reviewing the past could be great to help us fix problems.
First, the experience accumulated from the past would help us be more momentous and efficient to fix the difficulties of the present and the future. Some problems we would meet in the present or in the future are structurally similar, which means that we could use the wisdom and the experience from the past to figure out them. If we do not review, we could never remember the experience which might be useful and save time to fix problems. For example, when I was in my undergraduate study, I choose math as my major at first. However, I gradually found it is painful to learn math. And then I begin to review the past to figure out why I felt like that. Luckily I found the problem is my study habits were not good, which were similar to the past problems in my high school study. With the help of the experience that I obtained in my high school, I fixed the problem. Therefore, check the past could be really efficient to deal with the problems.
In addition, the mistakes we had made in the past could ensure us to be more confident in a similar situation. If we ignore the mistakes in the past and do not review them, it will be the same that we ignored the price we had paid, which could allow us to have the next similar adversity. For instance, like Steven Jobs, once he was forced to leave his own company Apple when he was young. But he didn’t defeat. He tried to analyze himself and learn from his mistakes which made him out of his company, in order to fix this big problem, which was also his life turning point. Finally, after his efforts, he went back to his previous company. In this way, learning from the mistakes and the past could make us be better to fix the terrible.
To sum up, I do think the reflection from the past could be really useful and helpful to our problems we are and will face, which allow us to use the experience and be safer. So, there is no doubt that people should review the past.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? To solve the problems of the present and the future, people should review the past. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Workers would be much happier if they are doing different types of tasks at the same time than doing the same task. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? To solve the problems of the present and the future, people should review the past. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People should not have to pay for public transportation that they use. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Movies and TV programs made in your own country are more interesting than movies and programs made in others. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 560, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: A
...I do agree with this statement. Herbert.A.Simon said the life without review and ...
^
Line 1, column 562, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Simon
...do agree with this statement. Herbert.A.Simon said the life without review and reflec...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, really, so, then, therefore, as for, for example, for instance, in addition, no doubt, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 15.1003584229 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 64.0 43.0788530466 149% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 78.0 52.1666666667 150% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2151.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 483.0 407.700716846 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.45341614907 4.8611393121 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68799114503 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48163571708 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.434782608696 0.524837075471 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 666.9 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8602095403 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.04 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.32 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.04 5.45110844103 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.85842293907 285% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256352144146 0.236089414692 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0857348055696 0.076458572812 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0764421541872 0.0737576698707 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189211061673 0.150856017488 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107222980209 0.0645574589148 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 11.7677419355 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 58.1214874552 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.1575268817 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.53 10.9000537634 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.9 8.01818996416 86% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.