In some organisations, promotions are based on seniority, while in other organisations, promotions are based on performance.Discuss advantages of each position. Then indicate which position you think is best and why.
Some people may think that promotions should be based on seniority. Others may prefer to be based on performance. The way organisations create the company´s structure and move vertically their human resources could work differently for each of them. In my opionion, I prefer an organisation that promotes their employees by seniority.
First of all, being a senior worker demonstrates a constant achievement of the company´s goals. Each company has different goals on their fiscal year which needs to be align with the investors or the founders of the company. For example, a senior staff who has been in the company for a long time, knows exactly how his or her goals are align with the company. On the contrary, a junior staff can perform well but it probably be more focus on his or her personal interests. This example demonstrates that achieving your performance is not enough to get a promotion.
Secondly, a person who is in a senior role has been consistent on time. An employee who has been in the company several years has demonstrated each year a good performance in order to be on that position. On the other hand, a junior member could perform well on the first year but not in the future. Personally, I think that to get a promotion and be closer to a management role, the employee needs to deliver good results every year.
Third, there is popular phrase which illustrates that when a person gets older, then it become more savvy. In my view, this aligns with my position. Being senior not only shows good performance, it also demonstrates that the employee has been part of different or hard situations which has contribute to learn other skills like communitation or delegation.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that promotions should be based on seniority. This is because a senior has a macro view of the company which helps to align his goals with the organisation´s goals, it has been constant in time and it has other skills than a Junior may not have.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-22 | Raed Mudawar | 80 | view |
- Some people prefer to change jobs or professions during their careers. Others choose to stay in the same job or profession. Discuss the advantages of each choice. Which do you prefer? Use reasons and examples to explain your choice. 70
- We can learn more from people at a higher level than us (like teachers) than from people who are at the same level as us 60
- Some people think that governments should spend as much money as possible on developing or buying computer technology. Other people disagree and think that this money should be spent on more basic needs. Which one of these opinions do you agree with? Use 73
- People always learn from their mistakes. 66
- To be successful at work or at school, we must be creative 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 344, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'aligned'.
Suggestion: aligned
... knows exactly how his or her goals are align with the company. On the contrary, a ju...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 433, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
... staff can perform well but it probably be more focus on his or her personal inter...
^^
Line 7, column 90, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'becomes'?
Suggestion: becomes
... that when a person gets older, then it become more savvy. In my view, this aligns wit...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 292, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'contributed'.
Suggestion: contributed
... different or hard situations which has contribute to learn other skills like communitatio...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, third, well, for example, i think, in conclusion, first of all, in my view, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1667.0 1977.66487455 84% => OK
No of words: 342.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87426900585 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93697112537 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 212.727598566 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.479532163743 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 506.7 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6457939069 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.6111111111 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.16666666667 5.45110844103 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164032670288 0.236089414692 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0666556467829 0.076458572812 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0780685273028 0.0737576698707 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109524639982 0.150856017488 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0714840196129 0.0645574589148 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 86.8835125448 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 61.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.