some parents encourage students to specialze in just one sport at early age. they want their children to be very skilled and competitive. Is this a good idea?
Some parents feel that involvement in just one sport helps their children to be very skilled and competitive. this idea has both positive and negative effects. On one hand, there are a number of benefits when parents encourage students to specialize in one sport. Firstly, early specialization will help children gain more experience to the sport and become more advanced because they have more time to practice. Therefore, they can easily reach goals and compete with other children. In addition, training in childhood is the most beneficial effect because this makes them get used to movements. In my opinion, however, there are many disadvantages of concentrating on one sport. The first drawback is it will prevent kids from expanding their other interests and children will not know in which they have the most talent. Besides, a child playing only one sport can become tired and rundown, possibly causing a desire to quit. In conclusion, early specialization in just one sport has advantages and disadvantages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-23 | Trương Thị Trà My | 85 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Some parents feel that involvement in ju...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 182, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...ren to be very skilled and competitive. this idea has both positive and negative eff...
^^^^
Line 1, column 1089, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sport has advantages and disadvantages.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, firstly, however, so, therefore, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 855.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21341463415 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85669918264 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.646341463415 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.6183507561 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.5 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.23603664747 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 3.83414634146 26% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.379251648604 0.215688989381 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140013827213 0.103423049105 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122613123859 0.0843802449381 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.379251648604 0.15604864568 243% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum two paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.