governments should spend money on railways rather than road
to what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement
Nowadays, it's argued that nations governments should pay more money for the improving issues and maintenance of the and railways instead of roads. On one hand many people claim that trains are more possible way of transportation and not cars. However, other opinion says that railways ranks 2nd in causes of transportation accidents. In my opinion, should pay more attention and money to develop trains as its easy and affordable for all people.
there's increase trend against governmental attitude in spending huge amount of money on railways claiming that it's a waste of money on so many levels. Firstly, with the rapidly increasing rhythm of life many commuters prefer using the underground or buses to go to their work on daily basis as it is very rapid and they save time. Secondly, many accidents have occurred all over the past 10 years that take lives of many people and the number is still counting. For an example, Egypt has witnessed catastrophic day in March 2019 when more than 200 people died in an unfortunate railway accident.
On the other hand an opposing voices encourage paying more for making a huge development in that important sector. For instance Japanese people have volunteered and collect donations to help the government improve the system of old trains cabinet and cars that leads to a major difference that makes Japan railway system became the 1st in the world for being the most rapid and safe. Also being a cheap transportation method many of poor people can afford so that they can commute to their work easily thanks to government pensions that absolutely ease their lives.
To close, there are many drawbacks for the railways but encouraging government to categorising a certain amount of country's finance is a must to help improving that significant transportation pillar.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-14 | trpg143 | 84 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Theres
...asy and affordable for all people. theres increase trend against governmental att...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: there's
...asy and affordable for all people. theres increase trend against governmental att...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 112, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...ount of money on railways claiming that its a waste of money on so many levels. Fir...
^^^
Line 7, column 31, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'voice'?
Suggestion: voice
...ent. On the other hand an opposing voices encourage paying more for making a huge...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 233, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'trains'' or 'train's'?
Suggestion: trains'; train's
...he government improve the system of old trains cabinet and cars that leads to a major ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 385, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...orld for being the most rapid and safe. Also being a cheap transportation method man...
^^^^
Line 10, column 138, Rule ID: MUST_HAVE_TO[1]
Message: After 'must', the verb is used without 'to'. Probably, you should use 'must' or 'have to' here.
Suggestion: must; have to
...certain amount of countrys finance is a must to help improving that significant transpo...
^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 151, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to improve' or 'improve'.
Suggestion: to improve; improve
...t of countrys finance is a must to help improving that significant transportation pillar....
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, for instance, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1525.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06644518272 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73040388075 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581395348837 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.5392166764 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.083333333 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0833333333 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.58333333333 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122668177772 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0485655511093 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0437189885597 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0768345770282 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0272204659148 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.