The charts show gross sales in five departments in the years 2010 and 2012.
The pie charts reflects the differences in revenues of five categories of products in a department store over the course of 3 years. Clearly the company's decision to hire new leadership to alter the store's sales trajectory has led to increased trade to everyday items and a decrease in big-ticket items.
In 2010, the electronics and fashion departments accounted of 65% of the store's gross revenue; by 2012, this number had dropped to exactly half of all sales. Although electronics remained the highest grossing department, it nevertheless showed the greatest overall reduction at 10%. Furniture, the other big-ticket item, saw sales shrink by more than half over the 3-year span falling to 4% from 10%.
Grocery items and housewares, meanwhile, increased significantly, jumping from 10% and 15% respectively to 23% each in 2012. For groceries, this is a jump of more than double the previous sales figure. This confirms a shift by consumers to more staple goods and everyday items, furniture and groceries each contributed to 10% of sales in 2010, with inverse changes in 2012.
- The Table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant. 56
- The illustrations show how chocolate is produced.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 11
- Some people think that children should be taught at school to recycle materials and avoid waste Other people believe that children should be taught this at home Discuss both opinions and give your own opinion 59
- The charts below show the reasons why people travel to work by bicycle or by a car.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The graph shows the information about the international conferences in three capital cities in 1980-2010. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, nevertheless, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 911.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17613636364 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88805761851 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636363636364 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.6876973678 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.875 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292691315543 0.215688989381 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102402701507 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0517221458653 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166522431369 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0526577775236 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.75 8.06136585366 121% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.