The chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of telephone calls in the uk devided into three categories, from 1995 -2002. summerise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevent.
The bar chart compare the time spent by UK residents on different types of telephone calls, namely local, national and international lines as well as mobiles between 1995-2002.
it's clear that during the period of eight years, local call was the dominant category while time spent on mobile phones cost the least of the time of British people. Also fixed line of domestic and oversea areas became increasing popular throughout the years.
From the chart, we can notice that the number of minutes of local calls was the highest amount overall. Before dropping from the year 1999, the figure for it saw a gradual climb, rising from approximatly 72 billion minutes to 90 billion minutes, reaching the peak. Followed by that was a steady decrease, reaching the 1995 figure in 2002.
Turing to the category of calls nationwide and worldwide, the span of years witnessed an general growth, from around 37 billion minutes to 61 billion minutes, with a slower climbing tendency in the last few years. As for the amount of mobile phones usage, it as well went through a total increase, however, as time went by, from which stage we can easily discover a more rapid growth between the year 1999 and 2002, from 13 billion minutes to 45 billion minutes, hitting the peak. Noteworthy is the fact that the smallest gap of there groups can be observed in 2002.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-25 | minakatori | 73 | view |
| 2019-04-25 | Calvinthebeast | 84 | view |
| 2018-09-13 | eyraen | 73 | view |
- A longer prison term as a way of punishing those who break the law is not as good as other methods. To what extend do you agree or disagree? 84
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of telephone calls in the uk devided into three categories, from 1995 -2002. summerise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevent. 84
- Biotechnology companies all over the world are developing different types of genetically modified (GM) crops. However, not enough is known about the effects of these crops on our health and on environment. Inferring with nature in this way should be prohi 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 178, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s as well as mobiles between 1995-2002. its clear that during the period of eigh...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Its
...s well as mobiles between 1995-2002. its clear that during the period of eight y...
^^^
Line 2, column 167, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...he least of the time of British people. Also fixed line of domestic and oversea area...
^^^^
Line 4, column 87, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... worldwide, the span of years witnessed an general growth, from around 37 billion ...
^^
Line 4, column 416, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d growth between the year 1999 and 2002, from 13 billion minutes to 45 billion mi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, well, while, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1119.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 232.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82327586207 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35497534769 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 106.607317073 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599137931034 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 331.2 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.6855826844 43.030603864 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.333333333 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7777777778 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200066187384 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0816655529639 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0498096179745 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115916412692 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0619762485064 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.