The most effective way to understand contemporary culture is to analyze the trends of its youth.
The statement mentioned here is revolving around one central theme – the definition of “contemporary culture”, or what all factors constitute a nation’s culture. Of course, it is a blend of how different age groups behave, and not only based on how the activities or likings of the younger generation. However, the behavior of the youth is one of the most important parts of this culture, and of course the strongest impetus to drive how the culture will shape up in near future. Let us examine the youth’s influence on the contemporary, and also on the upcoming culture of a nation.
A child learns from its surrounding groups, its parents, neighbours, friends and teachers, which themselves are again influenced by the contemporary culture. If a country is well known for a particular game that is played all over the country with very high enthusiasm, the child will definitely get exposed to numerous discussions and participations from its immediate surroundings, and thus will get interested in that game. This creates a sustained culture of that game in the nation, which the future generations are expected to carry forward. However, with the introduction of television and international sports channels, it has been observed recently that many cricket-playing countries are moving towards the games of soccer or tennis, because they see those sports in the television and gets more interested in those games, leaving behind their own national game. Thus, a cultural change automatically gets initiated. At the beginning, some elders may not like it, creating some conflicting situations across generations which eventually fades away and the new culture gets its permanent place to reign for a fairly extended period.
Coming back to the definition of contemporary culture, it is not what the youth alone is doing. As I mentioned, it should be a blend of how various age groups behaving. For example, there may be three age groups – the oldest enjoying music, the middle aged enjoying sports, and the youth enjoying social media. We cannot conclude that social media takes the central stage of the nation’s culture. Rather we have to agree that the country has a varied culture and there is a well-defined trend. However, if we want to forecast how it will look like twenty five years later, one can effortlessly state that music will get cornered, and social media will come up as the major culture of this nation.
To summarize, the behavior of the youth is not exactly the contemporary culture, but it’s a very storng indicator of how the future culture will shape up. Culture is not only about music or sports. Countries are known for their hospitality or hostility, for their traditional never-ending contribution towards science or arts, or for poverty. Whatever it may be, this logic still prevails.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-16 | jason123 | 58 | view |
2019-10-12 | million_Z | 66 | view |
2019-09-12 | jackpark33 | 50 | view |
2019-06-03 | pillaivishnu | 50 | view |
2019-04-26 | oindranil | 66 | view |
- 1.Many important discoveries or creations are accidental: it is usually while seeking the answer to one question that we come across the answer to another. 16
- It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero. 58
- Colleges and universities should require their students to spend at least one semester studying in a foreign country. 66
- The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries. 58
- People's attitudes are determined more by their immediate situation or surroundings than by society as a whole. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 402, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Rather,
...ral stage of the nation's culture. Rather we have to agree that the country has a...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, may, so, still, thus, well, for example, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2391.0 2235.4752809 107% => OK
No of words: 464.0 442.535393258 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15301724138 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64119157421 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99584702514 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 215.323595506 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525862068966 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 747.0 704.065955056 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 9.0 1.77640449438 507% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.2497543855 60.3974514979 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.55 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2 23.4991977007 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.21951772744 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173793395247 0.243740707755 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.058157769817 0.0831039109588 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0491205483191 0.0758088955206 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106418185993 0.150359130593 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0155698217648 0.0667264976115 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 14.1392134831 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 100.480337079 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.