Most people accept that we now live in a globlised world but not everyone agrees that this is beneficial. To what extent is globlisation positive or negative development.
Globalisation is here to stay, driven by advances in information technology and economic progress and increased international trade and investment. It has had wide - ranging positive and negative effects on employment and economic development, scientific research, language and culture and the environment.
One positive result of globalisation is the global distribution of labour, it is now easier to move to other countries to find work, and this leads to better employment prospects for people and to more diverse workplaces. Not only this, capital and industrial resources have migrated to developing nations, thus providing local jobs and boosting local economies. It has also resulted in greater contact between different cultures, as travel has become relatively safer and less expensive than past. Further, ease of communication has encouraged and unprecedented level of global scientific research and co-operation and a subsequent explosion of knowledge and information.
A downside of this global economy is that when a catastrophe occurs as in the recent global financial crisis that started in the USA, it affects the world. Similarly, when a virus emerges in one region of the world it spreads rapidly, threatening worldwide health. Furthermore, globalisation affects culture and language too, minority languages are dying out because of the highly demand of learning English for International Business and indigenous culture are dying out in favour of a dominant. Finally, levels of pollution are rising as countries strive for economic growth and competitive edge in the global market.
In conclusion, globalisation is a double-edged sword that has created jobs and promoted international co-operation but has led to cultural losses , more environmental damage , increased health risks and exposure economic crisis. So government as well as society should take some mutual action against the negative development of globalisation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-28 | Komalsandhu | 60 | view |
- The chart below shows household spending patterns in the two countries between 1980 and 2008. 40
- The charts shows the number of passengers who used three types of public transport in somewhere town from 2012 to 2015. 67
- Some people Say that self-employment is better than a job in a company or in a institutions which one is better? 73
- The graph shows the data about the annual earning of three different bakeries in London from 2000 to 2010. 73
- Most people accept that we now live in a globlised world but not everyone agrees that this is beneficial To what extent is globlisation positive or negative development 60
Comments
Thanks to check my essay and
Thanks to check my essay and giving me a band score.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 146, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...operation but has led to cultural losses , more environmental damage , increased h...
^^
Line 7, column 174, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...tural losses , more environmental damage , increased health risks and exposure eco...
^^
Line 7, column 269, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... So government as well as society should take some mutual action against the nega...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, furthermore, if, similarly, so, thus, well, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 10.4138276553 211% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1672.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.78546712803 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24552031872 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61937716263 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.770121565 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.333333333 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0833333333 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.41666666667 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0844011912589 0.244688304435 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0294170082841 0.084324248473 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0367468205096 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0484189991213 0.151304729494 32% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0208524288885 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.6 12.4159519038 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.45 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.