The table below shows the percentage of the population by age groups in
one town who rode bicycles in 2011.
The table compares the proportion of the population of one town who cycled in 2011,
according to five age groups.
Overall, it is clear that in all the age groups, the percentage of female cyclists was higher
than male cyclists. However, for both genders, the proportion of the population who rode
bicycles was lowest between the ages of 18 and 59.
Just over half of all females and males rode bicycles in the age group 0-9, and this
proportion remained high among 10-17 year old girls, at about 42%.However, among
boys aged 10-17, the percentage who cycled declined by over half to less than 25%.
The figures for the 18-39 and 40-59 year olds are much lower. In the former age group,
only about 17% of women cycled, compared with just under 10% of men. Between the
ages of 40 and 59, the figures fell further, to a little over 12% for women and 8 per cent
for men.
However, the percentage of those over 60 who rode bicycles then rose significantly,
reaching 18.5% for women compared with around 13% for men.
- The bar chart below shows the three main causes of land damage in four different areas in the world 56
- The charts below show the percentage of water used by different sectors in Sydney, Australia, in 1997 and 2007. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- this flow chart clearly divides the process of getting driving lecense in uS into three main parts and describes the features of each part 87
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of people living alone in 5 different age groups in the USA between 1850 and 2000. 78
- The table below shows the percentage of the population by age groups inone town who rode bicycles in 2011. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 67, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...mong 10-17 year old girls, at about 42%.However, among boys aged 10-17, the percentage...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 852.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68131868132 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33373582649 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582417582418 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.7287093885 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.5 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.125 5.23603664747 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 13.0 3.83414634146 339% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280203818367 0.215688989381 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127644788069 0.103423049105 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0933839034773 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108135955335 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0878066466376 0.0819641961636 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.33 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.