The chart below shows the annual pay (thousands of US dollars) for doctors
and other workers in seven countries in 2004.
The bar chart compares the yearly salary of doctors and other workers in several
countries in the year 2004.
Overall, it is clear that the pay of US doctors was much higher than that of doctors in the
other countries. In each country, the annual salary of doctors was far higher than that of
other workers.
The annual pay of doctors in the US was $120,000, whereas in Finland doctors received a
comparatively low yearly salary of $50,000. In France, and Switzerland doctors earned
$70,000 per year, compared with around $60,000 annually in Italy, Germany and the
Czech Republic.
In contrast, the annual wages of other workers were much lower, at about $45,000 and
$40,000 in the US and Switzerland, respectively. Other workers in France earned
$30,000, a little more than other workers in Finland, who had an annual salary of
$25,000. The lowest annual earnings were for other workers in Italy, Germany and the
Czech Republic, at exactly $20,000.
- The table shows the amount of money given in aid of technology of developing countries by charities in the US, EU and other countries from 2006 to 2010. 67
- The table shows the amount of money given in aid of technology ofdeveloping countries by charities in the US, EU and other countries from 2006 to2010. 73
- The table below shows the percentage of the population by age groups inone town who rode bicycles in 2011. 78
- The map below is of the town of Garlsdon. A new supermarket (S) is planned for the town. The map shows two possible sites for the supermarket 78
- the results of a research which examines the average percentage marks secured by boys and girls of different ages in several School subjects are given below 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
whereas, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 795.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96875 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40181409303 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 78.0 106.607317073 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.4875 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 222.3 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 14.3695641896 43.030603864 33% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 99.375 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 5.23603664747 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 12.0 3.83414634146 313% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230785927932 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125864629988 0.103423049105 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0517651562878 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107522394427 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0646517435604 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.