Imagine you if a professor or a lecture given you the wrong information to the audience, when did you ask the question?
During the meeting or after the meeting.
By and large, people often prepare well before they stand in front of the audience to give a speech. However, It is obvious to happen mistakes during the speech because of several factors such as tension, anxiety, and forgetfulness. Some audience points out the mistakes during the conference. But, Personally, If I were asking, I would wait until the end of the meeting. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
The first reason is distraction. While the asking question in the middle of the meeting or lecture creates destruction to both the audience and the speaker, I preferred to clarify doubt at the end of the session. My personal experience is an excellent example of this. When I was studying at Ohio state university for my master's, I attend a seminar, and the speaker started the lecture on Impact of advanced technology in the contemporary world. As the talk was going on seriously, he gave the wrong statistical data of technology annual growth. Even though I noticed that mistake, I Didn't highlight that point until the end of the session. When I asked that question at the end, the professor was delighted and said if you were asking in the middle of the lecture, I would distract, and spoil the entire talk. So it is always better to ask questions at the end.
The second reason is embarrassing. If a person were giving a speech in front of the broad audience means they are well qualified and knowladge persons. If I were criticizing such a person in front of a general audience, they might feel guilty. For instance, when I was studying high school, at Omak public school, My math teacher gives me the wrong formula to solve the problem. When I highlighted that mistake in front of the class, everybody in the class laughed at him; as a result, he feels guilty and left the class. If I asked after class, It wouldn't happen. Hence, Asking personal doubts after the class or the meets is always right.
In conclusion, although some people didn’t agree with my claim, I always prefer to clarify my doubts at the end of the session to avoid interruption of the lecture and to maintain dignity.
- decreased preference of novel reading and its impact on the society 81
- the reading passage advice several ways to retrieve salt lake water from excessive salt, while the lecture disagrees with it. summarise the points. 86
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect. In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?1）Interrupt and correct t 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
- Which technology has changed your life the most? Use examples and reasons to develop your argument. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 584, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: Didn't
.... Even though I noticed that mistake, I Didnt highlight that point until the end of t...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 551, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
... the class. If I asked after class, It wouldnt happen. Hence, Asking personal doubts a...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 643, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the class or the meets is always right. In conclusion, although some people didn...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, second, so, well, while, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, such as, as a result, by and large
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1777.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 379.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68865435356 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64131514473 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.519788918206 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 539.1 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 13.0 3.51792114695 370% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.648538232 48.9658058833 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.619047619 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0476190476 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.09523809524 5.45110844103 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.85842293907 285% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1754367973 0.236089414692 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0457480793265 0.076458572812 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0562823902702 0.0737576698707 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0836170894049 0.150856017488 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0615628983457 0.0645574589148 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.