The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given pie charts illustrate about average percentage of three types of unhealthy food such as sodium, saturated fats and added sugars in the USA.
In general, these pie charts reveal average percentage of American’s which consumed unhealthy meals if they eat so much.
In the first pie chart, it is shown about average percentage of sodium. If this meal had dinner, it has influenced 43 per cent. The less percentage of sodium belongs to snacks (14 percent). Interestingly, amount of sodium for snacks time is the same for breakfast time. The highest percentage of saturated fat is at dinner time like sodium, respectively, 37% and 43%. However, the less percentage of it is for breakfast. If we glance percentage of added sugar, the most amount of it is for snacks with 42 per cent. But, average percent for lunch time is seen almost all three typical meals such as 29 percent of sodium, 26 per cent of saturated fat and 19 % of added sugar.
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 61
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 67
- The graph below shows the unemployment rates in US and Japan between March 1993 and March 1999 67
- The chart shows the amount spent on six consumer goods in four European countries 61
- The chart below shoe the number of Japanese tourists travelling abroad between 1985 and 1995 and Australia s share of Japanese tourist market 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, in general, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 786.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76363636364 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69774613863 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563636363636 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 240.3 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.5453143371 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.6 112.824112599 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 5.23603664747 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167197695763 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0743983445654 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0610204967983 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149373250136 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0399848096766 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.03 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.21 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.